The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Determination of Noncovalent Binding Interactions Using Automated Nanoelectrospray Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) has proven to be an extremely powerful tool for studying biomolecular structures and noncovalent interactions. Here we report a method using a fully automated, chip-based nanoESI-MS system to determine the dissociation constants (Kd) for the complexes of two different proteins with their ligands. The automated nanoelectrospray system, consisting of the NanoMate and ESI chip, serves functionally as a combination of autosampler and nanoelectrospray ionization source. This system provides all the advantages of conventional nanoelectrospray plus automated, high-throughput analyses without carryover. The automated nanoESI system was used to investigate quantitative noncovalent interactions between ribonuclease A (RNase A) and cytidylic acid ligands (2'-CMP, CTP), a well-characterized model protein-ligand complex, and between an inactive endocellulase mutant (Thermobifida fusca Cel6A D117Acd) and four oligosaccharide ligands (cellotriose, cellotetraose, cellopentaose, cellohexaose). Both titration and competitive binding approaches were performed prior to automated nanoESI-MS analysis with a Q-TOF mass spectrometer. Dissociation constants for each complex were calculated from the sum of ion peak areas of free and complexed proteins during the titration and competition experiments. The measured Kd values for the RNase A-CMP and Cel6A D117Acd-G3 complexes were found to be in excellent agreement with the available published values obtained by standard spectroscopic titration techniques. To our knowledge, this is the first report of using an ESI-MS approach to study the interactions between a cellulase and oligosaccharides. The results provide new insights for understanding the nature of cellulase-cellulose interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry
Tamara, S., den Boer, M. A., & Heck, A. J. R. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00212 · Cited by 511
Protein Complexes in the Gas Phase: Technology for Structural Genomics and Proteomics
Benesch, J. L. P., Ruotolo, B. T., Simmons, D. A., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068289b · Cited by 408
Microfluidic systems in proteomics
Lion, N., Rohner, T. C., Dayon, L., Arnaud, I. L., Damoc, E., Youhnovski, N., Wu, Z., Roussel, C., Josserand, J., Jensen, H., et al. (2003) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200305629 · Cited by 262
Noncovalent Interactions of Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Acids with Serum Albumin
Bischel, H. N., MacManus-Spencer, L. A., & Luthy, R. G. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es101334s · Cited by 184
Chi, Q., Li, Z., Huang, J., Ma, J., & Wang, X. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.152 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Van Pelt, C. K., & Wilson, D. B.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-06-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3010-3018
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2029681303
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Determination of Noncovalent Binding Interactions Using Automated Nanoelectrospray Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac034089d
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Van Pelt, C. K., & Wilson, D. B. (2003). Quantitative Determination of Noncovalent Binding Interactions Using Automated Nanoelectrospray Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034089d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.