The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved β-Elimination-Based Affinity Purification Strategy for Enrichment of Phosphopeptides
Abstract
Alkaline-induced beta-elimination of phosphate from phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues followed by addition of an affinity tag has recently been pursued as a strategy for enriching phosphorylated species from complex mixtures. Here we report the use of an introduced thiol tag as the ligand for affinity purification via disulfide exchange with an activated thiol resin and the development of a protocol to improve the sensitivity considerably over previous reports (i.e., to subpicomole levels.) During our experiments, we observed a side reaction in which water was eliminated from unmodified serine residues. This side reaction resulted in the introduction of the affinity tag into unphosphorylated proteins, confounding attempts to specifically purify phosphoproteins from mixtures. Unchecked, this side reaction will also prevent application of the beta-elimination strategy to phosphopeptide samples where the phosphorylated species are minor components (i.e., most current phosphoproteomics applications). Quantitation of the side reaction products using three synthetic unphosphorylated peptides showed varying conversion efficiencies; at maximum, 1.7% of unphosphorylated peptide was converted to the affinity-tagged form. Inclusion of EDTA into the reaction reduced the side reaction but also greatly reduced the conversion efficiency of one of the phosphoserine residues of ovalbumin, suggesting a role for trace metal ions in the beta-elimination chemistry. Despite the presence of the side reaction, the affinity strategy was shown to be effective at enriching phosphopeptides from fairly complex peptide mixtures. The strategy was applied to the analysis of in vitro phosphorylation of bovine synapsin I by Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II, resulting in the identification of four phosphorylation sites, two of which have not been previously reported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid
Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., & Klenk, D. C. (1985) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7 · Cited by 18,482
Cited by
Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins
Beausoleil, S. A., Jedrychowski, M., Schwartz, D., Elias, J. E., Villén, J., Li, J., Cohn, M. A., Cantley, L. C., & Gygi, S. P. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0404720101 · Cited by 1,375
Interpreting the protein language using proteomics
Jensen, O. N. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1939 · Cited by 502
Kweon, H. K., & Håkansson, K. (2006) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0522355 · Cited by 489
Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics
Thingholm, T. E., Jensen, O. N., & Larsen, M. R. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800454 · Cited by 477
Jensen, S. S., & Larsen, M. R. (2007) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.3254 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- McLachlin, D. T., & Chait, B. T.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-18
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6826-6836
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1977378209
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.