Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chiral Ionic Liquids as Stationary Phases in Gas Chromatography

Ding, Jie, Welton, Thomas, Armstrong, Daniel W.·2004·Analytical Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/ac049144c
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recently, it has been found that room-temperature ionic liquids can be used as stable, unusual selectivity stationary phases. They show "dual nature" properties, in that they separate nonpolar compounds as if they are nonpolar stationary phases and separate polar compounds as if they are polar stationary phases. Extending ionic liquids to the realm of chiral separations can be done in two ways: (1) a chiral selector can be dissolved in an achiral ionic liquid, or (2) the ionic liquid itself can be chiral. There is a single precedent for the first approach, but nothing has been reported for the second approach. In this work, we present the first enantiomeric separations using chiral ionic liquid stationary phases in gas chromatography. Compounds that have been separated using these ionic liquid chiral selectors include alcohols, diols, sulfoxides, epoxides, and acetylated amines. Because of the synthetic nature of these chiral selectors, the configuration of the stereogenic center can be controlled and altered for mechanistic studies and reversing enantiomeric retention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac049144c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Fischer T., 1999, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 793, 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)02415-0 · DOI
  2. Lee C. W., 1999, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 2461, 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)00249-X · DOI
  3. Ludley P., 2001, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 2011, 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00064-8 · DOI
  4. Earle M. J., 1999, Green Chemistry, 1, 23, 10.1039/a808052f · DOI
  5. Adams C. J., 1998, Chem. Commun., 2097
  6. Stark A., 1999, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 63, 10.1039/a806708b · DOI
  7. Chauvin Y. L., 1996, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Commun., 34, 2698, 10.1002/anie.199526981 · DOI
  8. Suarez P. A. Z., 1996, Polyhedron, 15, 1217, 10.1016/0277-5387(95)00365-7 · DOI
  9. Anderson J. L., 2002, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 14247, 10.1021/ja028156h · DOI · Paper page
  10. Aqueous-Phase Organometallic, 1998, Concepts and Applications
  11. Huddleston J. G., 1998, Chem. Commun., 1765, 10.1039/A803999B · DOI
  12. Branco L. C., 2002, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Commun., 41, 2771, 10.1002/1521-3773(20020802)41:15<2771::AID-ANIE2771>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  13. Armstrong D. W., 1999, Anal. Chem., 71, 3873, 10.1021/ac990443p · DOI · Paper page
  14. Anderson J. L., 2003, Anal. Chem., 75, 4851, 10.1021/ac0345749 · DOI
  15. Barber D. W., 1959, J. Chem. Soc., 18, 10.1039/jr9590000018 · DOI
  16. Pachole F., 1982, Anal. Chem., 54, 1938, 10.1021/ac00249a006 · DOI
  17. Poole C. F., 1984, J. Chromatogr., 289, 299, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)95096-9 · DOI
  18. Furton K. G., 1987, Anal. Chem., 59, 1170, 10.1021/ac00135a021 · DOI
  19. Pomaville R. M., 1988, Anal. Chem., 60, 1103, 10.1021/ac00162a005 · DOI
  20. Poole S. K., 1995, Analyst, 120, 294
  21. Berthod A., 2001, Chromatographia, 53, 63, 10.1007/BF02492429 · DOI
  22. Howarth J., 1997, Tetrahedron Lett., 38, 3097, 10.1016/S0040-4039(97)00554-6 · DOI
  23. Wasserscheid P., 2002, Chem. Commun., 200, 10.1039/b109493a · DOI · Paper page
  24. Bao W., 2003, J. Org. Chem., 68, 591, 10.1021/jo020503i · DOI
  25. Thanh G. V., 2004, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1112, 10.1002/ejoc.200300601 · DOI
  26. Pėgot B., 2004, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 6425, 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.06.134 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ding, J., Welton, T., & Armstrong, D. W.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2004-10-21
Volume
76
Issue
22
Pages
6819-6822
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
DOI
10.1021/ac049144c
OpenAlex
W1966000221
Cited by
283
References
0
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.