The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbial Metabolomics with Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
An analytical method was set up suitable for the analysis of microbial metabolomes, consisting of an oximation and silylation derivatization reaction and subsequent analysis by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Microbial matrixes contain many compounds that potentially interfere with either the derivatization procedure or analysis, such as high concentrations of salts, complex media or buffer components, or extremely high substrate and product concentrations. The developed method was extensively validated using different microorganisms, i.e., Bacillus subtilis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, and Escherichia coli. Many metabolite classes could be analyzed with the method: alcohols, aldehydes, amino acids, amines, fatty acids, (phospho-) organic acids, sugars, sugar acids, (acyl-) sugar amines, sugar phosphate, purines, pyrimidines, and aromatic compounds. The derivatization reaction proved to be efficient (>50% transferred to derivatized form) and repeatable (relative standard deviations <10%). Linearity for most metabolites was satisfactory with regression coefficients better than 0.996. Quantification limits were 40-500 pg on-column or 0.1-0.7 mmol/g of microbial cells (dry weight). Generally, intrabatch precision (repeatability) and interbatch precision (reproducibility) for the analysis of metabolites in cell extracts was better than 10 and 15%, respectively. Notwithstanding the nontargeted character of the method and complex microbial matrix, analytical performance for most metabolites fit the requirements for target analysis in bioanalysis. The suitability of the method was demonstrated by analysis of E. coli samples harvested at different growth phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
van den Berg, R. A., Hoefsloot, H. C., Westerhuis, J. A., Smilde, A. K., & van der Werf, M. J. (2006) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-142 · Cited by 2,450
The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway
Stincone, A., Prigione, A., Cramer, T., Wamelink, M. M. C., Campbell, K., Cheung, E., Olin‐Sandoval, V., Grüning, N., Krüger, A., Tauqeer Alam, M., et al. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12140 · Cited by 1,576
Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI‐compliant studies
Fiehn, O., Wohlgemuth, G., Scholz, M., Kind, T., Lee, D. Y., Lu, Y., Moon, S., & Nikolau, B. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03387.x · Cited by 675
Scalbert, A., Brennan, L., Fiehn, O., Hankemeier, T., Kristal, B. S., van Ommen, B., Pujos-Guillot, E., Verheij, E., Wishart, D., & Wopereis, S. (2009) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-009-0168-0 · Cited by 565
Self-citationQuantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: status and perspectives
Koek, M. M., Jellema, R. H., van der Greef, J., Tas, A. C., & Hankemeier, T. (2011) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-010-0254-3 · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koek, M. M., Muilwijk, B., van der Werf, M. J., & Hankemeier, T.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-01-12
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1272-1281
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1966203257
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial Metabolomics with Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac051683+
- The paper
- Koek, M. M., Muilwijk, B., van der Werf, M. J., & Hankemeier, T. (2006). Microbial Metabolomics with Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051683%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.