Method for Distinguishing Specific from Nonspecific Protein−Ligand Complexes in Nanoelectrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
A new methodology for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein-ligand complexes in nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry (nanoES-MS) is described. The method involves the addition of an appropriate reference protein (P(ref)), which does not bind specifically to any of the solution components, to the nanoES solution containing the protein(s) and ligand(s) of interest. The occurrence of nonspecific protein-ligand binding is monitored by the appearance of nonspecific (P(ref) + ligand) complexes in the nanoES mass spectrum. Furthermore, the fraction of P(ref) undergoing nonspecific ligand binding provides a quantitative measure of the contribution of nonspecific binding to the measured intensities of protein and specific protein-ligand complexes. As a result, errors introduced into protein-ligand association constants, K(assoc), as determined with nanoES-MS, by nonspecific ligand binding can be corrected. The principal assumptions on which this methodology is based, namely, that the fraction of proteins and protein complexes that engage in nonspecific ligand binding during the nanoES process is determined by the number of free ligand molecules in the offspring droplets leading to gaseous ions and is independent of the size and structure of the protein or protein complex, are shown to be generally valid. The application of the method for the determination of K(assoc) for two protein-carbohydrate complexes, under conditions where nonspecific ligand binding is prevalent, is demonstrated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Informed estimations of relative binding affinities can be made by fitting the intensity ratio of bound and unbound protein as a function of ligand concentration.
“Nevertheless, informed estimations can be made about relative binding affinities by fitting the intensity ratio of bound and unbound protein as a function of ligand concentration21,72.”
From Native metabolomics identifies the rivulariapeptolide family of protease inhibitors (2022) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Dole, M., Mack, L. L., Hines, R. L., et al. (1968) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1670391 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
Daniel, J. M., Friess, S. D., Sudha, R., Wendt, S., & Zenobi, R. (2002) · International Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/s1387-3806(02)00585-7 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Structure of the Shiga-like Toxin I B-Pentamer Complexed with an Analogue of Its Receptor Gb3,
Ling, H., Boodhoo, A., Hazes, B., et al. (1998) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi971806n · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Peschke, M., Verkerk, U. H., & Kebarle, P. (2004) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2004.05.005 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Interaction of the Shiga-like Toxin Type 1 B-Subunit with Its Carbohydrate Receptor
Hilaire, P. M. S., Boyd, M. K., & Toone, E. J. (1994) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00252a011 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Fändrich, M., Tito, M. A., Leroux, M. R., Rostom, A. A., Hartl, F. U., Dobson, C. M., & Robinson, C. V. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.240326597 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Konermann, L., Silva, E. A., & Sogbein, O. F. (2001) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac010545r · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Griffey, R. H., Sannes‐Lowery, K. A., Drader, J. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0017108 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Daneshfar, R., Kitova, E. N., & Klassen, J. S. (2004) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0316972 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationBenkestock, K., Sundqvist, G., Edlund, P., & Roeraade, J. (2004) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.685 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Fluorescence Polarization to Study Galectin–Ligand Interactions
Sörme, P., Kahl-Knutson, B., Wellmar, U., et al. (2003) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)01033-4 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Mechanistic studies of multipole storage assisted dissociation
Håkansson, K., Axelsson, J., Palmblad, M., & Håkansson, P. (2000) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/s1044-0305(99)00144-0 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
[21] Mapping of hydrogen bonding between saccharides and proteins in solution
Glaudemans, C. P. J., Kováč, P., & Nashed, E. M. (1994) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(94)47023-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Analysis of Lectin–Carbohydrate Interactions by Capillary Affinophoresis
Shimura, K., & Kasai, K. (2003) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)01028-0 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Electrospray: From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now
Kebarle, P., & Verkerk, U. H. (2009) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20247 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Native Mass Spectrometry: What is in the Name?
Leney, A. C., & Heck, A. J. R. (2017) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1545-3 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
“For the latter, careful analysis is required as nonspecific association may occur during the ionization process for some systems, especially when the analyte concentrations are high and/or the binding affinities low [84, 85].”
BackgroundRecognition of human milk oligosaccharides by bacterial exotoxins
El-Hawiet, A., Kitova, E. N., & Klassen, J. S. (2015) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwv025 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationNative metabolomics identifies the rivulariapeptolide family of protease inhibitors
Reher, R., Aron, A. T., Fajtová, P., Stincone, P., Wagner, B., Pérez-Lorente, A. I., Liu, C., Shalom, I. Y. B., Bittremieux, W., Wang, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32016-6 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Reactivity of Diphenylpropynone Derivatives Toward Metal-Associated Amyloid-β Species
Pithadia, A. S., Kochi, A., Soper, M. T., Beck, M. W., Liu, Y., Lee, S., DeToma, A. S., Ruotolo, B. T., & Lim, M. H. (2012) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic302084g · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Native Metabolomics Unveils Suomilide Analogs with Potent Trypsin Inhibitory Activity
Naimi, A., Ulbricht, C., Trinh, T. L., Kehraus, S., Dreckmann, T. M., Linne, U., Hardes, K., Reher, R., & Baunach, M. (2026) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5c01380 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sun, J., Kitova, E. N., Wang, W., & Klassen, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Klassen, John S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3010-3018
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2004681646
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein-ligand complex, reference proteins, binding constant, protein-carbohydrate complex, binding specificity, free ligand concentration
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Carbohydrate Conformation, Carbohydrate Sequence, Carbohydrates, Ligands, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Nanotechnology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review