Cited by 160Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

Method for Distinguishing Specific from Nonspecific Protein−Ligand Complexes in Nanoelectrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Sun, Jiangxiao, Kitova, Elena N., Wang, Weijie, Klassen, John S.·2006·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

A new methodology for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein-ligand complexes in nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry (nanoES-MS) is described. The method involves the addition of an appropriate reference protein (P(ref)), which does not bind specifically to any of the solution components, to the nanoES solution containing the protein(s) and ligand(s) of interest. The occurrence of nonspecific protein-ligand binding is monitored by the appearance of nonspecific (P(ref) + ligand) complexes in the nanoES mass spectrum. Furthermore, the fraction of P(ref) undergoing nonspecific ligand binding provides a quantitative measure of the contribution of nonspecific binding to the measured intensities of protein and specific protein-ligand complexes. As a result, errors introduced into protein-ligand association constants, K(assoc), as determined with nanoES-MS, by nonspecific ligand binding can be corrected. The principal assumptions on which this methodology is based, namely, that the fraction of proteins and protein complexes that engage in nonspecific ligand binding during the nanoES process is determined by the number of free ligand molecules in the offspring droplets leading to gaseous ions and is independent of the size and structure of the protein or protein complex, are shown to be generally valid. The application of the method for the determination of K(assoc) for two protein-carbohydrate complexes, under conditions where nonspecific ligand binding is prevalent, is demonstrated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac0522005

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informed estimations of relative binding affinities can be made by fitting the intensity ratio of bound and unbound protein as a function of ligand concentration.

    “Nevertheless, informed estimations can be made about relative binding affinities by fitting the intensity ratio of bound and unbound protein as a function of ligand concentration21,72.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, J., Kitova, E. N., Wang, W., & Klassen, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Klassen, John S.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
78
Issue
9
Pages
3010-3018
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2004681646
Cited by
160
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Keywords
protein-ligand complex, reference proteins, binding constant, protein-carbohydrate complex, binding specificity, free ligand concentration
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Carbohydrate Conformation, Carbohydrate Sequence, Carbohydrates, Ligands, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Nanotechnology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review