The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromatographic Alignment of ESI-LC-MS Proteomics Data Sets by Ordered Bijective Interpolated Warping
Abstract
Mass spectrometry proteomics typically relies upon analyzing outcomes of single analyses; however, comparing raw data across multiple experiments should enhance both peptide/protein identification and quantitation. In the absence of convincing tandem MS identifications, comparing peptide quantities between experiments (or fractions) requires the chromatographic alignment of MS signals. An extension of dynamic time warping (DTW), termed ordered bijective interpolated warping (OBI-Warp), is presented and used to align a variety of electrospray ionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (ESI-LC-MS) proteomics data sets. An algorithm to produce a bijective (one-to-one) function from DTW output is coupled with piecewise cubic hermite interpolation to produce a smooth warping function. Data sets were chosen to represent a broad selection of ESI-LC-MS alignment cases. High confidence, overlapping tandem mass spectra are used as standards to optimize and compare alignment parameters. We determine that Pearson's correlation coefficient as a measure of spectra similarity outperforms covariance, dot product, and Euclidean distance in its ability to produce correct alignments with optimal and suboptimal alignment parameters. We demonstrate the importance of penalizing gaps for best alignments. Using optimized parameters, we show that OBI-Warp produces alignments consistent with time standards across these data sets. The source and executables are released under MIT style license at http://obi-warp.sourceforge.net/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D., & Yates, J. R. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/85686 · Cited by 4,752
An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences
Gotoh, O. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90398-9 · Cited by 1,724
Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling
Andersen, J. S., Wilkinson, C. J., Mayor, T., Mortensen, P., Nigg, E. A., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02166 · Cited by 1,319
Large-Scale Proteomic Analysis of the Human Spliceosome
Rappsilber, J., Ryder, U., Lamond, A. I., & Mann, M. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.473902 · Cited by 943
Desiere, F. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj040 · Cited by 910
A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research
Pedrioli, P. G. A., Eng, J. K., Hubley, R., Vogelzang, M., Deutsch, E. W., Raught, B., Pratt, B., Nilsson, E., Angeletti, R. H., Apweiler, R., et al. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1031 · Cited by 780
Nielsen, N.-P. V., Carstensen, J. M., & Smedsgaard, J. (1998) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00021-1 · Cited by 760
Tomasi, G., van den Berg, F., & Andersson, C. (2004) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.859 · Cited by 709
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs
Silva, J. C., Denny, R., Dorschel, C. A., Gorenstein, M., Kass, I. J., Li, G.-Z., McKenna, T., Nold, M. J., Richardson, K., Young, P., et al. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac048455k · Cited by 639
Eilers, P. H. C. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac034800e · Cited by 636
Cited by
Pang, Z., Zhou, G., Ewald, J., Chang, L., Hacariz, O., Basu, N., & Xia, J. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-022-00710-w · Cited by 1,444
Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.021 · Cited by 616
Gorrochategui, E., Jaumot, J., Lacorte, S., & Tauler, R. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.07.004 · Cited by 352
IPO: a tool for automated optimization of XCMS parameters
Libiseller, G., Dvorzak, M., Kleb, U., Gander, E., Eisenberg, T., Madeo, F., Neumann, S., Trausinger, G., Sinner, F., Pieber, T., et al. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0562-8 · Cited by 342
X13CMS: Global Tracking of Isotopic Labels in Untargeted Metabolomics
Huang, X., Chen, Y.-J., Cho, K., Nikolskiy, I., Crawford, P. A., & Patti, G. J. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403384n · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Prince, J. T., & Marcotte, E. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-07-28
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6140-6152
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2038866778
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatographic Alignment of ESI-LC-MS Proteomics Data Sets by Ordered Bijective Interpolated Warping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac0605344
- The paper
- Prince, J. T., & Marcotte, E. M. (2006). Chromatographic Alignment of ESI-LC-MS Proteomics Data Sets by Ordered Bijective Interpolated Warping. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0605344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
