The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MALDI-MS Direct Tissue Analysis of Proteins: Improving Signal Sensitivity Using Organic Treatments
Abstract
Direct tissue analysis using MALDI-MS allows the generation of profiles while maintaining the integrity of the tissue, displaying cellular localizations and avoiding tedious extraction and purification steps. However, lower spectral quality can result from direct tissue analysis due to variations in section thickness, the nature of the tissue, and the limited access to peptides/proteins due to high lipid content. To improve signal sensitivity, we have developed a tissue-washing procedure using organic solvents traditionally used for lipid extraction, i.e., CHCl3, hexane, toluene, acetone, and xylene. The increased detection for peptides/proteins (m/z 5000-30,000) is close to 40% with chloroform or xylene, and 25% with hexane, while also improving sample reproducibility for each solvent used in the present study. This strategy improved matrix cocrystallization with tissue peptides/proteins and more importantly with cytoplasmic proteins without delocalization. The extracted lipids were characterized by nanoESI-QqTOF/MS/MS using the precursor ion mode, lithium adducts, or both and were identified as phospholipids including phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, and lysophosphatidylinositol, confirming membrane lipid extraction from the tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A RAPID METHOD OF TOTAL LIPID EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION
Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J. (1959) · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1139/o59-099 · Cited by 54,751
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers.
Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., & Chait, B. T. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00024a716 · Cited by 1,930
Cited by
Norris, J. L., & Caprioli, R. M. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3004295 · Cited by 696
A concise review of mass spectrometry imaging
Amstalden van Hove, E. R., Smith, D. F., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.033 · Cited by 416
Mass spectrometry imaging with high resolution in mass and space
Römpp, A., & Spengler, B. (2013) · Histochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1007/s00418-013-1097-6 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemaire, R., Wisztorski, M., Desmons, A., Tabet, J. C., Day, R., Salzet, M., & Fournier, I.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-09-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7145-7153
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1996803981
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.