The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glyconanoparticles for the Colorimetric Detection of Cholera Toxin
Abstract
Cholera continues to represent a major threat to human health, particularly in developing countries. Death can be readily avoided when medical treatment is rapidly administered. In order to provide a means of detecting the bacterially secreted toxin, we have developed a simple, yet rapid, bioassay for the cholera toxin. The colorimetric bioassay is based on a specifically synthesized lactose derivative that is self-assembled onto gold nanoparticles of 16 nm diameter. In solution the lactose-stabilized nanoparticles are red in color due to the intense surface plasmon absorption band centered at 524 nm. Cholera toxin (added as the B-subunit) (CTB) binds to the lactose derivative and induces aggregation of the nanoparticles. Upon aggregation, the surface plasmon absorption band broadens and red shifts such that the nanoparticle solution appears a deep purple color. The selectivity of the bioassay stems from the thiolated lactose derivative that mimics the GM(1) ganglioside--the receptor to which cholera toxin binds in the small intestine. Consequently, added metal ions, anions, and a protein, at relevant concentrations, do not induce nonspecific aggregation of the nanoparticles. The simple color change of the bioassay provides a selective means to detect and quantify the cholera toxin within 10 min. The theoretical limit of detection of the bioassay was determined to be 54 nM (3 microg/mL) for CTB. The stability of the lactose-stabilized nanoparticles was established by freeze-drying and then resuspending the particles in water and subsequently measuring CTB in biologically relevant electrolyte solutions. This colorimetric bioassay provides a new tool for the direct measurement of cholera toxin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gold Nanoparticles in Chemical and Biological Sensing
Saha, K., Agasti, S. S., Kim, C., Li, X., & Rotello, V. M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2001178 · Cited by 4,620
Applications of Nanoparticles in Biology
De, M., Ghosh, P. S., & Rotello, V. M. (2008) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200703183 · Cited by 1,547
Design of Gold Nanoparticle‐Based Colorimetric Biosensing Assays
Zhao, W., Brook, M. A., & Li, Y. (2008) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.200800282 · Cited by 768
Conde, J., Dias, J. T., Grazú, V., Moros, M., Baptista, P. V., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2014.00048 · Cited by 425
El-Boubbou, K., Gruden, C., & Huang, X. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja076086e · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Schofield, C. L., Field, R. A., & Russell, D. A.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-01-19
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1356-1361
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2092972170
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glyconanoparticles for the Colorimetric Detection of Cholera Toxin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac061462j
- The paper
- Schofield, C. L., Field, R. A., & Russell, D. A. (2007). Glyconanoparticles for the Colorimetric Detection of Cholera Toxin. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061462j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.