The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Capacity Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Coupling a Porous Sheathless Interface with Transient-Isotachophoresis
Abstract
A sheathless interface making use of a porous tip has been used for coupling capillary electrophoresis and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. First, effective flow rates using the interface have been characterized. It was found that the interface is capable of generating a stable spray with flow rates ranging from below 10 nL/min to >340 nL/min, enabling its use in either the mass or concentration-sensitive region of the electrospray process. Subsequently, by analyzing peptide mixtures of increasing complexity, we have demonstrated that this platform provides exquisite sensitivity enabling the detection of very low amounts of materials with very high resolving power. Transient isotachophoresis (t-ITP) can also be integrated with this setup to increase the mass loading of the system while maintaining peak efficiency and resolution. Concentration limits of detection in the subnanomolar or nanomolar range can be achieved with or without t-ITP, respectively. The application of a vacuum at the inlet of the separation capillary further allowed the peak capacity of the system to be improved while also enhancing its efficiency. As a final step in this study, it was demonstrated that the intrinsic properties of the interface allows the use of coated noncharged surfaces so that very high peak capacities can be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mischak, H., Coon, J. J., Novak, J., Weissinger, E. M., Schanstra, J. P., & Dominiczak, A. F. (2009) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20205 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Kuehnbaum, N. L., & Britz-McKibbin, P. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300484s · Cited by 354
Sun, L., Zhu, G., Zhang, Z., Mou, S., & Dovichi, N. J. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00100 · Cited by 216
Capillary Electrophoresis Separations of Glycans
Lu, G., Crihfield, C. L., Gattu, S., Veltri, L. M., & Holland, L. A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00669 · Cited by 174
Haselberg, R., de Jong, G. J., & Somsen, G. W. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac303158f · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Busnel, J.-M., Schoenmaker, B., Ramautar, R., Carrasco-Pancorbo, A., Ratnayake, C., Feitelson, J. S., Chapman, J. D., Deelder, A. M., & Mayboroda, O. A.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-10-28
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 9476-9483
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2329699243
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.