The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Portable and Quantitative Detection of Protein Biomarkers and Small Molecular Toxins Using Antibodies and Ubiquitous Personal Glucose Meters
Open accessAbstract
Developing portable and low-cost methods for quantitative detection of large protein biomarkers and small molecular toxins can play a significant role in controlling and preventing diseases or toxins outbreaks. Despite years of research, most current methods still require laboratory-based or customized devices that are not widely available to the general public for quantitative analysis. We have previously demonstrated the use of personal glucose meters (PGMs) and functional DNAs for the detection of many nonglucose targets. However, the range of targets detectable by functional DNAs is limited at the current stage. To expand the range of targets that can be detected by PGMs, we report here the use of antibodies in combination with sandwich and competitive assays for quantitative detection of protein biomarkers (PSA, with a detection limit of 0.4 ng/mL) and small molecular toxins (Ochratoxin A, with a detection limit of 6.8 ng/mL), respectively. In both assay methods, with invertase conjugates as the link, quantitative detection is achieved via the dependence between the concentrations of the targets in the sample and the glucose measured by PGMs. Given the wide availability of antibodies for numerous targets, the methods demonstrated here can expand the range of target detection by PGMs significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Glucose Sensors and Their Applications in Diabetes Management
Heller, A., & Feldman, B. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068069y · Cited by 1,707
Overview on self-monitoring of blood glucose
Montagnana, M., Caputo, M., Giavarina, D., & Lippi, G. (2009) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.01.002 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Ge, Z., Lin, M., Wang, P., Pei, H., Yan, J., Shi, J., Huang, Q., He, D., Fan, C., & Zuo, X. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac4037262 · Cited by 501
McConnell, E. M., Cozma, I., Mou, Q., Brennan, J. D., Lu, Y., & Li, Y. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00240f · Cited by 477
Self-citationThe Era of Digital Health: A Review of Portable and Wearable Affinity Biosensors
Tu, J., Torrente‐Rodríguez, R. M., Wang, M., & Gao, W. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906713 · Cited by 357
Yan, L., Zhu, Z., Zou, Y., Huang, Y., Liu, D., Jia, S., Xu, D., Wu, M., Zhou, Y., Zhou, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3114714 · Cited by 329
Recent Advances in Electrochemical Immunosensors
Wen, W., Yan, X., Zhu, C., Du, D., & Lin, Y. (2017) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04281 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiang, Y., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4174-4178
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2008903062
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.