Cited by 262Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

RAMClust: A Novel Feature Clustering Method Enables Spectral-Matching-Based Annotation for Metabolomics Data

Broeckling, C. D., Afsar, F. A., Neumann, S., Ben-Hur, A., Prenni, J. E.·2014·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Metabolomic data are frequently acquired using chromatographically coupled mass spectrometry (MS) platforms. For such datasets, the first step in data analysis relies on feature detection, where a feature is defined by a mass and retention time. While a feature typically is derived from a single compound, a spectrum of mass signals is more a more-accurate representation of the mass spectrometric signal for a given metabolite. Here, we report a novel feature grouping method that operates in an unsupervised manner to group signals from MS data into spectra without relying on predictability of the in-source phenomenon. We additionally address a fundamental bottleneck in metabolomics, annotation of MS level signals, by incorporating indiscriminant MS/MS (idMS/MS) data implicitly: feature detection is performed on both MS and idMS/MS data, and feature-feature relationships are determined simultaneously from the MS and idMS/MS data. This approach facilitates identification of metabolites using in-source MS and/or idMS/MS spectra from a single experiment, reduces quantitative analytical variation compared to single-feature measures, and decreases false positive annotations of unpredictable phenomenon as novel compounds. This tool is released as a freely available R package, called RAMClustR, and is sufficiently versatile to group features from any chromatographic-spectrometric platform or feature-finding software.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac501530d

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broeckling, C. D., Afsar, F. A., Neumann, S., Ben-Hur, A., & Prenni, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PK)
  • Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (DE)
  • Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
Corresponding author
  • Broeckling, C. D.
  • Prenni, J. E.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2014-06-26
Volume
86
Issue
14
Pages
6812-6817
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2325106992
Cited by
262
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
feature clustering, spectral matching, metabolite annotation, chromatography-mass spectrometry, feature detection, unsupervised clustering, false positive reduction, metabolite identification
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Horses, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, Mass Spectrometry, Cluster Analysis, Databases, Factual, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review