Cited by 103Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Towards a harmonized identification scoring system in LC-HRMS/MS based non-target screening (NTS) of emerging contaminants

Open access
Alygizakis, Nikiforos, Lestremau, Francois, Gago-Ferrero, Pablo, Gil-Solsona, Rubén, Arturi, Katarzyna, Hollender, Juliane, Schymanski, Emma L., Dulio, Valeria +2 more·2023·TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trac.2023.116944

Cites

35 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advancement of HRMS and data-processing software has significantly expanded possibilities for SSA and NTA, enabling detection of previously unknown contaminants in complex environmental matrices.

    “The advancement of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and data-processing software has significantly expanded the possibilities for SSA and non-targeted analysis (NTA), enabling the detection of previously unknown contaminants in complex environmental matrices such as water, soil, plants, and even human tissue [14].”

    From Integrated Targeted and Suspect Screening Workflow for Identifying PFAS of Concern in Urban-Impacted Serbian Rivers (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction says HRMS advances expanded the analytical window for suspect and non-target analysis and enabled tentative identification of many potential contaminants across a wide variety of matrices. The paper also describes automated data-processing tools, but it does not establish that software advances enabled detection of previously unknown contaminants or substantiate the cited sentence’s specific list of water, soil, plants, and human tissue. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. W. Yang, Y. Tang, L. Jiang, P. Luo, Y. Wu, Y. Cao, X. Wu, J. Xiong, Sci. Total Environ. 809 (2022), 151117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151117. · DOI
  2. M. Meringer, S. Reinker, J. Zhang, A. Muller, Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 65 (2011), 0340-6253.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alygizakis, N., Lestremau, F., Gago-Ferrero, P., Gil-Solsona, R., Arturi, K., Hollender, J., Schymanski, E. L., Dulio, V., Slobodnik, J., & Thomaidis, N. S.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • Institut national de l'environnement industriel et des risques (FR)
Corresponding author
Alygizakis, Nikiforos
Venue
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
159
Pages
116944
ISSN
0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317492915
Cited by
103
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 14
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (A18/BM/12341006, 12341006)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (RYC2019-027913-I)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
non-target screening, emerging contaminants, machine learning classification, LC-HRMS/MS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review