The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oxidation of Chromium(III) with Potassium Ferrate(VI)
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTOxidation of Chromium(III) with Potassium Ferrate(VI)J. M. Schreyer, G. W. Thompson, and L. T. OckermanCite this: Anal. Chem. 1950, 22, 11, 1426–1427Publication Date (Print):November 14, 1950Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 14 November 1950https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac60047a022https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60047a022research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views683Altmetric-Citations72LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Ge…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This value is slightly higher than the reported value of 0.0291 µM cm - 1 12,13 .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“because the molar absorptive of Fe (VI) at 505 nm is low (1.5 x 10 3 M -1 cm -1 , R 2 = 0.99976) 13 .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Although, electrochemical synthesis of Fe 6+ is very promising for water treatment applications, the common quantification methods for the electrochemically-generated ferrates face a number of challenges such as high pH conditions, low concentration of ferrates (µM range), and the presence of Fe 3+ .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Figure 6 shows the absorption spectra for a number of different ferrate concentrations with the maximum absorption peak at about 351 nm, in agreement with previous studies 13 .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“however ABTS solution are unstable and must be used within 30 minutes after preparation 12,13,18 .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The ferrate spectra show a maximum at 505 nm and two minima at 390 nm and 670 nm in close agreement with previous studies 13 .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The method uses sodium iodide (NaI) solution to determine concentrations of Fe (VI) at low (< 10 µM) concentrations levels in water 12,13 .”
From Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments (2017) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, Y., Um, I.-H., & Yoon, J. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es034203+ · Cited by 299
Analytical quantification of electrochemical ferrates for drinking water treatments
Cataldo Hernández, M. A., May, A., Bonakdapour, A., Mohseni, M., & Wilkinson, D. P. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1139/cjc-2016-0315 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreyer, J. M., Thompson, G. W., & Ockerman, L. T.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1950-11-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1426-1427
- ISSN
- 0003-2700
- 1520-6882
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review