The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Digital Microfluidic Approach to Homogeneous Enzyme Assays
Abstract
A digital microfluidic device was applied to a variety of enzymatic analyses. The digital approach to microfluidics manipulates samples and reagents in the form of discrete droplets, as opposed to the streams of fluid used in channel microfluidics. This approach is more easily reconfigured than a channel device, and the flexibility of these devices makes them suitable for a wide variety of applications. Alkaline phosphatase was chosen as a model enzyme and used to convert fluorescein diphosphate into fluorescein. Droplets of alkaline phosphatase and fluorescein diphosphate were merged and mixed on the device, resulting in a 140-nL, stopped-flow reaction chamber in which the fluorescent product was detected by a fluorescence plate reader. Substrate quantitation was achieved with a linear range of 2 orders of magnitude and a detection limit of approximately 7.0 x 10-20 mol. Addition of a small amount of a nonionic surfactant to the reaction buffer was shown to reduce the adsorption of enzyme to the device surface and extend the lifetime of the device without affecting the enzyme activity. Analyses of the enzyme kinetics and the effects of inhibition with inorganic phosphate were performed, and Km and kcat values of 1.35 microM and 120 s-1, respectively, agreed with those obtained in a conventional 384-well plate under the same conditions (1.85 microM and 155 s-1). A phototype device was also developed to perform multiplexed enzyme analyses. It was concluded that the digital microfluidic format is able to perform detailed and reproducible assays of substrate concentrations and enzyme activity in much smaller reaction volumes and with higher sensitivity than conventional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Choi, K., Ng, A. H. C., Fobel, R., & Wheeler, A. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143028 · Cited by 817
Self-citationLatest Developments in Micro Total Analysis Systems
Arora, A., Simone, G., Salieb-Beugelaar, G. B., Kim, J. T., & Manz, A. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac100969k · Cited by 421
Magnetic digital microfluidics – a review
Zhang, Y., & Nguyen, N.-T. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00025a · Cited by 364
Digital microfluidics for cell-based assays
Barbulovic-Nad, I., Yang, H., Park, P. S., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b717759c · Cited by 337
Self-citationDigital microfluidics: a versatile tool for applications in chemistry, biology and medicine
Jebrail, M. J., Bartsch, M. S., & Patel, K. D. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40318h · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, E. M., & Wheeler, A. R.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-01-26
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1614-1619
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2071433864
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Digital Microfluidic Approach to Homogeneous Enzyme Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac702269d
- The paper
- Miller, E. M., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). A Digital Microfluidic Approach to Homogeneous Enzyme Assays. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac702269d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.