The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fundamentals of Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TW IMS) is a new IMS method implemented in the Synapt IMS/mass spectrometry system (Waters). Despite its wide adoption, the foundations of TW IMS were only qualitatively understood and factors governing the ion transit time (the separation parameter) and resolution remained murky. Here we develop the theory of TW IMS using derivations and ion dynamics simulations. The key parameter is the ratio (c) of ion drift velocity at the steepest wave slope to wave speed. At low c, the ion transit velocity is proportional to the squares of mobility (K) and electric field intensity (E), as opposed to linear scaling in drift tube (DT) IMS and differential mobility analyzers. At higher c, the scaling deviates from quadratic in a way controlled by the waveform profile, becoming more gradual with the ideal triangular profile but first steeper and then more gradual for realistic profiles with variable E. At highest c, the transit velocity asymptotically approaches the wave speed. Unlike with DT IMS, the resolving power of TW IMS depends on mobility, scaling as K(1/2) in the low-c limit and less at higher c. A nonlinear dependence of the transit time on mobility means that the true resolving power of TW IMS differs from that indicated by the spectrum. A near-optimum resolution is achievable over an approximately 300-400% range of mobilities. The major predicted trends are in agreement with TW IMS measurements for peptide ions as a function of mobility, wave amplitude, and gas pressure. The issues of proper TW IMS calibration and ion distortion by field heating are also discussed. The new quantitative understanding of TW IMS separations allows rational optimization of instrument design and operation and improved spectral calibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meier, F., Brunner, A.-D., Koch, S., Koch, H., Lubeck, M., Krause, M., Goedecke, N., Decker, J., Kosinski, T., Park, M. A., et al. (2018) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.tir118.000900 · Cited by 965
Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Fundamental Concepts, Instrumentation, Applications, and the Road Ahead
Dodds, J. N., & Baker, E. S. (2019) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1007/s13361-019-02288-2 · Cited by 574
Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements
Gabelica, V., Shvartsburg, A. A., Afonso, C., Barran, P., Benesch, J. L. P., Bleiholder, C., Bowers, M. T., Bilbao, A., Bush, M. F., Campbell, J. L., et al. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21585 · Cited by 493
Self-citationIon mobility mass spectrometry of proteins and proteinassemblies
Uetrecht, C., Rose, R. J., van Duijn, E., Lorenzen, K., & Heck, A. J. R. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b914002f · Cited by 462
Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation
Cumeras, R., Figueras, E., Davis, C. E., Baumbach, J. I., & Gràcia, I. (2015) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c4an01100g · Cited by 459
Lapthorn, C., Pullen, F., & Chowdhry, B. Z. (2013) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21349 · Cited by 398
Ion mobility in the pharmaceutical industry: an established biophysical technique or still niche?
Campuzano, I. D., & Lippens, J. L. (2018) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.11.008 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Shvartsburg, A. A., & Smith, R. D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-06
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 9689-9699
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1991437941
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.