The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Study of Biodistribution and Urinary Excretion of Surface-Modified Silica Nanoparticles
Abstract
The biodistribution and urinary excretion of different surface-modified silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) in mice were investigated in situ using an in vivo optical imaging system. Three types of surface-modified SiNPs, including OH-SiNPs, COOH-SiNPs, and PEG-SiNPs with a size of approximately 45 nm, have been prepared with RuBPY doped for imaging purposes. Intravenous (i.v.) injection of these SiNPs followed by fluorescence tracing in vivo using the Maestro in vivo imaging system indicated that OH-SiNPs, COOH-SiNPs, and PEG-SiNPs were all cleared from the systemic blood circulation, but that both the clearance time and subsequent biological organ deposition were dependent on the surface chemical modification of the SiNPs. Thus, for instance, the PEG-SiNPs exhibited relatively longer blood circulation times and lower uptake by the reticuloendothelial system organs than OH-SiNPs and COOH-SiNPs. More interestingly, in vivo real-time imaged dominant signal in bladder and urine excretion studies revealed that all three types of i.v.-injected SiNPs with a size of approximately 45 nm were partly excreted through the renal excretion route. These conclusions were further confirmed through ex vivo organ optical imaging and TEM imaging and energy-dispersed X-ray spectrum analysis of urine samples. These findings would have direct implications for the use of SiNPs as delivery systems and imaging tools in live animals. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the in vivo optical imaging method is helpful for in vivo sensing the biological effects of SiNPs by using luminescent dye doped in the silica matrix as a synchronous signal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Cited by
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Croissant, J. G., Fatieiev, Y., Almalik, A., & Khashab, N. M. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201700831 · Cited by 594
Versatile Types of Organic/Inorganic Nanohybrids: From Strategic Design to Biomedical Applications
Zhao, N., Yan, L., Zhao, X., Chen, X., Li, A., Zheng, D., Zhou, X., Dai, X., & Xu, F.-J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00401 · Cited by 429
Biocompatibility of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
Asefa, T., & Tao, Z. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx300166u · Cited by 422
Lin, Y.-S., & Haynes, C. L. (2009) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901259n · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- He, X., Nie, H., Wang, K., Tan, W., Wu, X., & Zhang, P.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-14
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 9597-9603
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2032882923
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.