The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous-Flow Polymerase Chain Reaction of Single-Copy DNA in Microfluidic Microdroplets
Abstract
We present a high throughput microfluidic device for continuous-flow polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in water-in-oil droplets of nanoliter volumes. The circular design of this device allows droplets to pass through alternating temperature zones and complete 34 cycles of PCR in only 17 min, avoiding temperature cycling of the entire device. The temperatures for the applied two-temperature PCR protocol can be adjusted according to requirements of template and primers. These temperatures were determined with fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) inside the droplets, exploiting the temperature-dependent fluorescence lifetime of rhodamine B. The successful amplification of an 85 base-pair long template from four different start concentrations was demonstrated. Analysis of the product by gel-electrophoresis, sequencing, and real-time PCR showed that the amplification is specific and the amplification factors of up to 5 x 10(6)-fold are comparable to amplification factors obtained in a benchtop PCR machine. The high efficiency allows amplification from a single molecule of DNA per droplet. This device holds promise for convenient integration with other microfluidic devices and adds a critical missing component to the laboratory-on-a-chip toolkit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vogelstein, B., & Kinzler, K. W. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.16.9236 · Cited by 1,770
Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors
Diehl, F., Li, M., Dressman, D., He, Y., Shen, D., Szabo, S., Diaz, L. A., Goodman, S. N., David, K. A., Juhl, H., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507904102 · Cited by 1,188
Millisecond Kinetics on a Microfluidic Chip Using Nanoliters of Reagents
Song, H., & Ismagilov, R. F. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0354566 · Cited by 693
Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR
Williams, R., Peisajovich, S. G., Miller, O. J., Magdassi, S., Tawfik, D. S., & Griffiths, A. D. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth896 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications
Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b820557b · Cited by 1,647
Seemann, R., Brinkmann, M., Pfohl, T., & Herminghaus, S. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016601 · Cited by 1,049
Quan, P.-L., Sauzade, M., & Brouzes, E. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18041271 · Cited by 664
Girod, M., Moyano, E., Campbell, D. I., & Cooks, R. G. (2011) · Chem. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c0sc00416b · Cited by 419
Droplet microfluidics: recent developments and future applications
Casadevall i Solvas, X., & deMello, A. (2011) · Chem. Commun. · doi:10.1039/c0cc02474k · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaerli, Y., Wootton, R. C., Robinson, T., Stein, V., Dunsby, C., Neil, M. A. A., French, P. M. W., deMello, A. J., Abell, C., & Hollfelder, F.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-12-04
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 302-306
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2043628508
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.