The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon Microelectrodes with a Renewable Surface
Open accessAbstract
Electrode fouling decreases sensitivity and can be a substantial limitation in electrochemical experiments. In this work we describe an electrochemical procedure that constantly renews the surface of a carbon microelectrode using periodic triangle voltage excursions to an extended anodic potential at a scan rate of 400 V s(-1). This methodology allows for the regeneration of an electrochemically active surface and restores electrode sensitivity degraded by irreversible adsorption of chemical species. We show that repeated voltammetric sweeps to moderate potentials in aqueous solution causes oxidative etching of carbon thereby constantly renewing the electrochemically active surface. Oxidative etching was established by tracking surface-localized fluorine atoms with XPS, by monitoring changes in carbon surface morphology with AFM on pyrolyzed photoresist films, and also by optical and electron microscopy. The use of waveforms with extended anodic potentials showed substantial increases in sensitivity toward the detection of catechols. This enhancement arose from the adsorption of the catechol moiety that could be maintained with a constant regeneration of the electrode surface. We also demonstrate that application of the extended waveform could restore the sensitivity of carbon microelectrodes diminished by irreversible adsorption (electrode fouling) of byproducts resulting from the electrooxidation and polymerization of tyramine. Overall, this work brings new insight into the factors that affect electrochemical processes at carbon electrodes and provides a simple method to remove or reduce fouling problems associated with many electrochemical experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent trends in carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules: A review
Yang, C., Denno, M. E., Pyakurel, P., & Venton, B. J. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2015.05.049 · Cited by 577
New trends in the electrochemical sensing of dopamine
Jackowska, K., & Krysinski, P. (2013) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6578-2 · Cited by 461
A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design
Wellman, S. M., Eles, J. R., Ludwig, K. A., Seymour, J. P., Michelson, N. J., McFadden, W. E., Vazquez, A. L., & Kozai, T. D. Y. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201701269 · Cited by 389
Fundamentals of fast-scan cyclic voltammetry for dopamine detection
Venton, B. J., & Cao, Q. (2020) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c9an01586h · Cited by 357
Recent strategies to minimise fouling in electrochemical detection systems
Hanssen, B. L., Siraj, S., & Wong, D. K. Y. (2016) · Reviews in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1515/revac-2015-0008 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Takmakov, P., Zachek, M. K., Keithley, R. B., Walsh, P. L., Donley, C., McCarty, G. S., & Wightman, R. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-10
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2020-2028
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1994221731
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon Microelectrodes with a Renewable Surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac902753x
- The paper
- Takmakov, P., Zachek, M. K., Keithley, R. B., Walsh, P. L., Donley, C., McCarty, G. S., & Wightman, R. M. (2010). Carbon Microelectrodes with a Renewable Surface. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902753x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.