The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane)
Abstract
This paper describes a procedure that makes it possible to design and fabricate (including sealing) microfluidic systems in an elastomeric material [Formula: see text] poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [Formula: see text] in less than 24 h. A network of microfluidic channels (with width >20 μm) is designed in a CAD program. This design is converted into a transparency by a high-resolution printer; this transparency is used as a mask in photolithography to create a master in positive relief photoresist. PDMS cast against the master yields a polymeric replica containing a network of channels. The surface of this replica, and that of a flat slab of PDMS, are oxidized in an oxygen plasma. These oxidized surfaces seal tightly and irreversibly when brought into conformal contact. Oxidized PDMS also seals irreversibly to other materials used in microfluidic systems, such as glass, silicon, silicon oxide, and oxidized polystyrene; a number of substrates for devices are, therefore, practical options. Oxidation of the PDMS has the additional advantage that it yields channels whose walls are negatively charged when in contact with neutral and basic aqueous solutions; these channels support electroosmotic pumping and can be filled easily with liquids with high surface energies (especially water). The performance of microfluidic systems prepared using this rapid prototyping technique has been evaluated by fabricating a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis system. Amino acids, charge ladders of positively and negatively charged proteins, and DNA fragments were separated in aqueous solutions with this system with resolution comparable to that obtained using fused silica capillaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chaudhury, M. K., & Whitesides, G. M. (1991) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la00053a033 · Cited by 658
Self-citation
Cited by
Bhatia, S. N., & Ingber, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2989 · Cited by 3,305
The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research
Sackmann, E. K., Fulton, A. L., & Beebe, D. J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13118 · Cited by 2,995
Unconventional Methods for Fabricating and Patterning Nanostructures
Xia, Y., Rogers, J. A., Paul, K. E., & Whitesides, G. M. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr980002q · Cited by 1,538
Self-citationThe upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics
Bhattacharjee, N., Urrios, A., Kang, S., & Folch, A. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00163g · Cited by 1,123
A guide to the organ-on-a-chip
Leung, C. M., de Haan, P., Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., Kim, G.-A., Ko, J., Rho, H. S., Chen, Z., Habibovic, P., Jeon, N. L., Takayama, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6 · Cited by 1,116
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffy, D. C., McDonald, J. C., Schueller, O. J. A., & Whitesides, G. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-10-24
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4974-4984
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2026908430
- Cited by
- 5,288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.