The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Conversion-Type Electrodes for Lithium Rechargeable Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Conspectus The need/desire to lower the consumption of fossil fuels and its environmental consequences has reached unprecedented levels in recent years. A global effort has been undertaken to develop advanced renewable energy generation and especially energy storage technologies, as they would enable a dramatic increase in the effective and efficient use of renewable (and often intermittent) energy sources. The development of electrical energy storage (EES) technologies with high energy and power densities, long life, low cost, and safe use represents a challenge from both the fundamental science and technological application points of view. While the advent and broad deployment of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has dramatically changed the EES landscape, their performance metrics need to be greatly enhanced to keep pace with the ever-increasing demands imposed by modern consumer electronics and especially the emerging automotive markets. Current battery technologies are mostly based on the use of a transition metal oxide cathode (e.g., LiCoO 2, LiFePO 4, or LiNiMnCoO 2 ) and a graphite anode, both of which depend on intercalation/insertion of lithium ions for operation. While the cathode material currently limits the battery capacity and overall energy density, there is a great deal of interest in the development of high-capacity cathode materials as well as anode materials. Conversion reaction materials have been identified/proposed as potentially high-energy-density alternatives to intercalation-based materials. However, conversion reaction materials react during lithiation to form entirely new products, often with dramatically changed structure and chemistry, by reaction mechanisms that are still not completely understood. This makes it difficult to clearly distinguish the limitations imposed by the mechanism and practical losses from initial particle morphology, synthetic approaches, and electrode preparations. Transition metal compounds such as transition metal oxides, sulfides, fluorides, phosphides, and nitrides can undergo conversion reactions yielding materials with high theoretical capacity (generally from 500 to 1500 mA h g –1 ). In particular, a number of transition metal oxides and sulfides have shown excellent electrochemical properties as high-capacity anode materials. In addition, some transition metal fluorides have shown great potential as cathode materials for Li rechargeable batteries. In this Account we present mechanistic studies, with emphasis on the use of operando methods, of selected examples of conversion-type materials as both potentially high-energy-density anodes and cathodes in EES applications. We also include examples of the conceptually similar conversion-type reactions involving chalcogens and halogens, with emphasis on the Li–S system. In this case we focus on the problems arising from the low electrical conductivities of elemental sulfur and Li 2 S and the “redox shuttle” phenomena of polysulfides. In addition to mechanistic insights from the use of operando methods, we also cover several key strategies in electrode materials design such as controlling the size, morphology, composition, and architecture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries
Poizot, P., Laruelle, S., Grugeon, S., Dupont, L., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35035045 · Cited by 8,041
A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
Ji, X., Lee, K. T., & Nazar, L. F. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2460 · Cited by 5,988
A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries
Liang, X., Hart, C., Pang, Q., Garsuch, A., Weiss, T., & Nazar, L. F. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6682 · Cited by 2,062
Mn3O4−Graphene Hybrid as a High-Capacity Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries
Wang, H., Cui, L.-F., Yang, Y., Sanchez Casalongue, H., Robinson, J. T., Liang, Y., Cui, Y., & Dai, H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja105296a · Cited by 1,948
Smaller Sulfur Molecules Promise Better Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Xin, S., Gu, L., Zhao, N.-H., Yin, Y.-X., Zhou, L.-J., Guo, Y.-G., & Wan, L.-J. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja308170k · Cited by 1,644
Graphene Oxide as a Sulfur Immobilizer in High Performance Lithium/Sulfur Cells
Ji, L., Rao, M., Zheng, H., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Duan, W., Guo, J., Cairns, E. J., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja206955k · Cited by 1,505
Lithium–sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer
Su, Y.-S., & Manthiram, A. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2163 · Cited by 1,458
Sulfur-Impregnated Disordered Carbon Nanotubes Cathode for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Guo, J., Xu, Y., & Wang, C. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl202297p · Cited by 1,278
Meyer, B. (1976) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60301a003 · Cited by 996
Cited by
Energy storage: The future enabled by nanomaterials
Pomerantseva, E., Bonaccorso, F., Feng, X., Cui, Y., & Gogotsi, Y. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan8285 · Cited by 1,927
Self-citationCurrent Li-Ion Battery Technologies in Electric Vehicles and Opportunities for Advancements
Miao, Y., Hynan, P., von Jouanne, A., & Yokochi, A. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12061074 · Cited by 874
Voltage issue of aqueous rechargeable metal-ion batteries
Liu, Z., Huang, Y., Huang, Y., Yang, Q., Li, X., Huang, Z., & Zhi, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00131j · Cited by 783
Li-free Cathode Materials for High Energy Density Lithium Batteries
Wang, L., Wu, Z., Zou, J., Gao, P., Niu, X., Li, H., & Chen, L. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.011 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, S.-H., Feng, X., Zhang, N., Seok, J., & Abruña, H. D.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-01-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-281
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2784532118
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Conversion-Type Electrodes for Lithium Rechargeable Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00487
- The paper
- Yu, S.-H., Feng, X., Zhang, N., Seok, J., & Abruña, H. D. (2018). Understanding Conversion-Type Electrodes for Lithium Rechargeable Batteries. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.