The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries
Open accessAbstract
The lithium–sulfur battery is receiving intense interest because its theoretical energy density exceeds that of lithium-ion batteries at much lower cost, but practical applications are still hindered by capacity decay caused by the polysulfide shuttle. Here we report a strategy to entrap polysulfides in the cathode that relies on a chemical process, whereby a host—manganese dioxide nanosheets serve as the prototype—reacts with initially formed lithium polysulfides to form surface-bound intermediates. These function as a redox shuttle to catenate and bind ‘higher’ polysulfides, and convert them on reduction to insoluble lithium sulfide via disproportionation. The sulfur/manganese dioxide nanosheet composite with 75 wt% sulfur exhibits a reversible capacity of 1,300 mA h g−1 at moderate rates and a fade rate over 2,000 cycles of 0.036%/cycle, among the best reported to date. We furthermore show that this mechanism extends to graphene oxide and suggest it can be employed more widely. The polysulfide shuttle is a major problem leading to capacity decay in lithium–sulfur batteries. Here, the authors show that in-situ-generated thiosulfate species on a manganese oxide nanosheet act as a polysulfide mediator, which effectively prevents polysulfide dissolution, leading to enhanced cyclability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Koerver, R., Aygün, I., Leichtweiß, T., Dietrich, C., Zhang, W., Binder, J. O., Hartmann, P., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 · Cited by 1,020
Carbon materials for Li–S batteries: Functional evolution and performance improvement
Liang, J., Sun, Z.-H., Li, F., & Cheng, H.-M. (2016) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.007 · Cited by 593
Zhu, B., Jin, Y., Hu, X., Zheng, Q., Zhang, S., Wang, Q., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201603755 · Cited by 587
Two‐Dimensional Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Next‐Generation Rechargeable Batteries
Mei, J., Liao, T., Kou, L., & Sun, Z. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700176 · Cited by 459
Xu, N., Qian, T., Liu, X., Liu, J., Chen, Y., & Yan, C. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04610 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, X., Hart, C., Pang, Q., Garsuch, A., Weiss, T., & Nazar, L. F.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-01-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5682-5682
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989121075
- Cited by
- 2,062
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 103.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms6682
- The paper
- Liang, X., Hart, C., Pang, Q., Garsuch, A., Weiss, T., & Nazar, L. F. (2015). A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6682
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.