The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-Ligand Metal–Organic Frameworks and Heteroleptic Coordination Cages as Multifunctional Scaffolds—A Comparison
Open accessAbstract
Porous nanostructures and materials based on metal-mediated self-assembly have developed into a vibrantly studied subdiscipline of supramolecular chemistry during the past decades. In principle, two branches of such coordination compounds can be distinguished: Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) on the one side represent infinite porous networks of metals or metal clusters that are connected via organic ligands to give solid-state materials. On the other hand, metal-organic cages (MOCs) are discrete and soluble systems with only a limited number of pores. Formation of a particular structure type is achieved by carefully balancing the donor site angles within the ligands as well as the nature and coordination geometry of the metal component. Years of research on MOFs and MOCs has yielded numerous types of well-defined porous crystals and complex supramolecular architectures. Since various synthetic routes and postsynthetic modification methods have been established, the focus of recent developments has moved toward the preparation of multifunctional systems that are able to mimic the structural and functional complexity of natural enzymes. This Account compares different strategies to prepare multifunctional MOFs and heteroleptic MOCs and gives a perspective on where to move forward. While the preparative toolbox for multifunctional MOFs is already quite mature, pore accessibility and substrate diffusion within the crystal have been identified as major challenges yet to be overcome. Only recently have a set of different strategies for the assembly of heteroleptic MOCs been developed. Such multifunctional cages can be formed from either partially protected or "naked" metal cations. Controlled assembly, producing single products rather than statistical mixtures, leans on assembly-dependent approaches making use of either steric effects or shape complementarity between the ligands. Further strategies include coordination-site engineering and hierarchical assembly of preformed components. The main challenge with heteroleptic, functional MOCs is to find a balance between the required dynamic assembly fidelity and the stability of the resulting system under operating conditions. If these limitations can be overcome in the future, chemists will be able to design multifunctional systems of similar activity and complexity as nature's enzymes from simple and easily accessible synthetic building blocks. Major impacts on chemical sensing, small-molecule recognition and sequestration, drug delivery, and catalysis will be achieved by these materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
A New Zirconium Inorganic Building Brick Forming Metal Organic Frameworks with Exceptional Stability
Cavka, J. H., Jakobsen, S., Olsbye, U., Guillou, N., Lamberti, C., Bordiga, S., & Lillerud, K. P. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8057953 · Cited by 7,336
Metal–Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors
Kreno, L. E., Leong, K., Farha, O. K., Allendorf, M., Van Duyne, R. P., & Hupp, J. T. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200324t · Cited by 7,136
Metal–Organic Frameworks in Biomedicine
Horcajada, P., Gref, R., Baati, T., Allan, P. K., Maurin, G., Couvreur, P., Férey, G., Morris, R. E., & Serre, C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200256v · Cited by 4,168
Cook, T. R., Zheng, Y.-R., & Stang, P. J. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3002824 · Cited by 2,950
Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis
Yoon, M., Srirambalaji, R., & Kim, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2003147 · Cited by 2,856
Multiple Functional Groups of Varying Ratios in Metal-Organic Frameworks
Deng, H., Doonan, C. J., Furukawa, H., Ferreira, R. B., Towne, J., Knobler, C. B., Wang, B., & Yaghi, O. M. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181761 · Cited by 1,917
Cook, T. R., & Stang, P. J. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5005666 · Cited by 1,818
Recent advances in gas storage and separation using metal–organic frameworks
Li, H., Wang, K., Sun, Y., Lollar, C. T., Li, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2018) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.006 · Cited by 1,571
Mechanically Interlocked Molecules (MIMs)—Molecular Shuttles, Switches, and Machines (Nobel Lecture)
Stoddart, J. F. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201703216 · Cited by 1,041
Cited by
Multifunctional metal–organic framework heterostructures for enhanced cancer therapy
Liu, J., Huang, J., Zhang, L., & Lei, J. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00178c · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Pullen, S., & Clever, G. H.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-10-31
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3052-3064
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2898983779
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed-Ligand Metal–Organic Frameworks and Heteroleptic Coordination Cages as Multifunctional Scaffolds—A Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00415
- The paper
- Pullen, S., & Clever, G. H. (2018). Mixed-Ligand Metal–Organic Frameworks and Heteroleptic Coordination Cages as Multifunctional Scaffolds—A Comparison. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.