Three-Mediator Enhanced Collisions on an Ultramicroelectrode for Selective Identification of Single Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Abstract
Selective detection of colliding entities, especially cells and microbes, is of great challenge in single-entity electrochemistry. Herein, based on the different cellular electron transport pathways between microbes and mediators, we report a three-mediator system [K 3 Fe(CN) 6 , K 4 Fe(CN) 6 , and menadione] to achieve redox activity analysis and selective identification of single Saccharomyces cerevisiae without the usage of antibodies. K 4 Fe(CN) 6 in the three-mediator system will oxidize near the electrode surface and increase the local concentration of K 3 Fe(CN) 6 , which will promote the redox reaction of S. cerevisiae . The hydrophobic mediator─menadione─can selectively penetrate through the S. cerevisiae membrane and get access to its intracellular redox center and can further react with K 3 Fe(CN) 6 in the bulk solution. In contrast, the mediator can only get access to the bacterial membranes of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus , which results in different electrochemical collision signals between the above microbes. In the three-mediator system, upward step-like collision signals were observed in S. cerevisiae suspension, which are related to their microbial redox activity. In comparison, E. coli or S. aureus only generated downward current steps because the blockage effect of mediator diffusion suppresses their redox activities. When S. cerevisiae co-existed with E. coli or S. aureus , transients generated by both blockage and redox activity were observ…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies deal with the use of redox mediators for probing the electrochemical activity of a bacterium.
“In order to develop single-impact electrochemistry toward the identification of bacterial cells, several studies deal with the use of redox mediators for probing the electrochemical activity of the bacterium [32][33][34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Menadione, a hydrophobic mediator, can selectively penetrate the S. cerevisiae membrane, access its intracellular redox center, and react with K3Fe(CN)6 in bulk solution.
“The hydrophobic mediator (menadione) can selectively penetrate through the S. cerevisiae membrane and get access to its intracellular redox center, then can further react with K 3 Fe(CN) 6 in the bulk solution (Fig. 3b, top left) [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Chen et al. reported a three-mediator system (K3Fe(CN)6, K4Fe(CN)6, and menadione) that achieves redox activity analysis and selective identification of single Saccharomyces cerevisiae without antibodies.
“In a recent study, Chen et al. have reported a three-mediator system (K 3 Fe(CN) 6 , K 4 Fe(CN) 6 , and menadione) for achieving redox activity analysis and selective identification of single Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae, a yeast) without the use of antibodies (Fig. 3b, top) [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Single collisions of microorganisms onto the UME surface involve a blocking effect on potassium ferrocyanide diffusion near the UME surface.
“Thus, single collisions of microorganisms onto the UME surface involve a blocking effect on the potassium ferrocyanide diffusion near the UME surface (as discussed in the first section of this review) [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Redox reactions between S. cerevisiae cells and mediators reduce K3Fe(CN)6 to K4Fe(CN)6 and increase the local concentration of K4Fe(CN)6.
“However, the redox reactions between the S. cerevisiae cells and mediators also reduce K 3 Fe(CN) 6 to K 4 Fe(CN) 6 and increase the local concentration of K 4 Fe(CN) 6 at the same time.”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Because the current signal generated by S. cerevisiae is opposite to those from E. coli and S. aureus in the three-mediator system, S. cerevisiae can be selectively detected and distinguished in a mixed microbial suspension.
“Due to the opposition between the current signal generated by S. cerevisiae and the ones from E. coli and S. aureus in the three-mediator system, S. cerevisiae can be selectively detected and distinguished in the mixed microbial suspension [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
When the three-mediator system is extended to E. coli and S. aureus, different electrochemical collision signals are observed.
“In contrast, different electrochemical collision signals have been observed when the three-mediator system experiments are extended to E. coli (Fig. 3b, bottom) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, Gram-positive) bacteria (not shown here) [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
The three-mediator system work provides a proof of concept for selective detection of single S. cerevisiae cells from a mixed microbial consortium based on the electrochemical collision technique.
“Hence, this works provides a proof of concept for the selective detection of single S. cerevisiae cells from a mixed microbial consortium, based on the electrochemical collision technique [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
In the three-mediator system, i-t curves for S. cerevisiae show positive current step transients combined with a steady-state current increase, corresponding to impacts and adsorption of S. cerevisiae cells onto the UME surface.
“Hence, the corresponding i-t curves for this microorganism in the threemediator system show positive current step transients, combined with a steady state current increase (Fig. 3b, top right), corresponding to the impacts and adsorption of S. cerevisiae cells onto the UME surface [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
In the three-mediator system, an initial current arises from continuous oxidation of K4Fe(CN)6 to K3Fe(CN)6 at a carbon fiber UME (7 μm diameter) polarized at +0.7 V vs Ag/AgCl, corresponding to the diffusion-limited steady state.
“In the three-mediator system, there is an initial current due to the continuous oxidation of K 4 Fe(CN) 6 to K 3 Fe(CN) 6 at the carbon fiber UME (diameter: 7 µm) polarized at +0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl (corresponding to the diffusion-limited steady state) [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
In the three-mediator system, E. coli and S. aureus only generate downward current steps because blocking of mediator diffusion suppresses their redox activities, so only blocking collisions are observed in their i-t curves.
“Indeed, both E. coli and S. aureus only generate downward current steps because the blocking effect of mediator diffusion suppresses their redox activities (illustrated in Fig. 3b, bottom left for E. coli), thus only blocking collisions are observed in the i-t curves (shown in Fig. 3b, bottom right for E. coli) for these two types of bacteria in the three-mediator system [34].”
From Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Ronspees, A. T., & Thorgaard, S. N. (2018) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.006 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lebègue, E., Costa, N. L., Louro, R. O., & Barrière, F. (2020) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab9e39 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trends in single-impact electrochemistry for bacteria analysis
Smida, H., Langlard, A., Ameline, D., Thobie-Gautier, C., Boujtita, M., & Lebègue, E. (2023) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-023-04568-z · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Chen, X., Peng, M., Peng, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.202503631 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, D., Gao, G., & Zhi, J.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Guanyue
- Zhi, Jinfang
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-09-06
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 12630-12637
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W4294838760
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (2204099)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21874143)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Keywords
- single-cell detection, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, potassium ferricyanide, potassium ferrocyanide, menadione, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, single-entity electrochemistry
- MeSH terms
- Escherichia coli, Oxidation-Reduction, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Staphylococcus aureus, Vitamin K 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review