Cited by 33Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Bridged Hybrid Monolithic Column Coupled to High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics

Open access
Liang, Yu, Jin, Yutong, Wu, Zhijie, Tucholski, Trisha, Brown, Kyle A., Zhang, Lihua, Zhang, Yukui, Ge, Ying·2019·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Top-down mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has become a powerful tool for comprehensive characterization of intact proteins. However, because of the high complexity of the proteome, highly effective separation of intact proteins from complex mixtures prior to MS analysis remains challenging. Monolithic columns have shown great promise for intact protein separation due to their high permeability, low backpressure, and fast mass transfer. Herein, for the first time, we developed bridged hybrid bis(triethoxysilyl)ethylene (BTSEY) monolith with C8 functional groups (C8@BTSEY) for highly effective protein separation and coupled it to high-resolution MS for identification of intact proteins from complex protein mixtures. We have optimized mobile phase conditions of our monolith-based reverse-phase chromatography (RPC) for online liquid chromatography (LC)-MS analysis and evaluated separation reproducibility of the C8@BTSEY column. We further assessed the chromatographic performance of this column by separating a complex protein mixture extracted from swine heart tissue. Using our monolithic column (i.d. 100 μm × 35 cm), we separated over 300 proteoforms (up to 104 kDa) from 360 ng of protein mixture in an 80 min one-dimensional (1D) LC run. The highly effective separation and recovery of intact proteins from this monolithic column allowed unambiguous identification of ∼100 proteoforms including a large protein, αactinin2 (103.77 kDa), by online 1D LC-MS/MS analysis for the first time. As demonstrated, this C8@BTSEY column is reproducible and effective in separation of intact proteins, which shows high promise for top-down proteomics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05817

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liang et al. demonstrated that a bridged hybrid bis(triethoxysilyl)ethylene monolith with C8 functional groups afforded high-resolution separation of complex cardiac lysate including α-actinin2 (103.77 kDa).

    “Liang et al. demonstrated that bridged hybrid bis(triethoxysilyl)ethylene monolith with C8 functional groups afforded high-resolution separation of complex cardiac lysate including a large proteoform, α-actinin2 (103.77 kDa) [72].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Inagaki S; Guan S; Fukushima Y; Ohsuna T; Terasaki O J Am Chem Soc 1999, 121, 9611– 9614.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, Y., Jin, Y., Wu, Z., Tucholski, T., Brown, K. A., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., & Ge, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Lihua
  • Ge, Ying
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-01-22
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
1743-1747
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2913098300
Cited by
33
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL096971, R01 HL109810)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21575139)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM117058, R01 GM125085)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
top-down proteomics, monoliths, intact protein separation, proteoforms, reverse-phase chromatography, high-resolution mass spectrometry
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Myocardium, Swine, Reproducibility of Results, Organosilicon Compounds, Proteome, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Chromatography, Reverse-Phase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review