Cited by 130Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Microsampling Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry Enables Single-Cell Proteomics in Complex Tissues: Developing Cell Clones in Live Xenopus laevis and Zebrafish Embryos

Open access
Lombard-Banek, Camille, Moody, Sally A., Manzini, M. Chiara, Nemes, Peter·2019·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Label-free single-cell proteomics by mass spectrometry (MS) is currently incompatible with complex tissues without requiring cell culturing, single-cell dissection, or tissue dissociation. We here report the first example of label-free single-cell MS-based proteomics directly in single cells in live vertebrate embryos. Our approach integrates optically guided in situ subcellular capillary microsampling, one-pot extraction-digestion of the collected proteins, peptide separation by capillary electrophoresis, ionization by an ultrasensitive electrokinetically pumped nanoelectrospray, and detection by high-resolution MS (Orbitrap). With a 700 zmol (420 000 copies) lower limit of detection, this trace-sensitive technology confidently identified and quantified ∼750-800 protein groups (<1% false-discovery rate) by analyzing just ∼5 ng of protein digest, viz. <0.05% of the total protein content from individual cells in a 16-cell Xenopus laevis (frog) embryo. After validating the approach by recovering animal-vegetal-pole proteomic asymmetry in the frog zygote, the technology was applied to uncover proteomic reorganization as the animal-dorsal (D11) cell of the 16-cell embryo gave rise to its neural-tissue-fated clone in the embryo developing to the 32-, 64-, and 128-cell stages. In addition to enabling proteomics on smaller cells in X. laevis, we also demonstrated this technology to be scalable to single cells in live zebrafish embryos. Microsampling single-cell MS-based proteomics raises exciting opportunities to study cell and developmental processes directly in complex tissues and whole organisms at the level of the building block of life: the cell.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00345

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Label-free single-cell CE-MS quantified about 750 protein groups in a 16-cell Xenopus laevis embryo with about 5 ng of protein digest.

    “More recently, the same research group reported the use of CE-MS in conjunction with label-free single-cell proteomics for quantification ~ 750 protein groups in 16-cell Xenopus laevis (frog) embryo with about 5ng of protein digest131.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lombard-Banek, C., Moody, S. A., Manzini, M. C., & Nemes, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-03-03
Volume
91
Issue
7
Pages
4797-4805
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2918185572
Cited by
130
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R35GM124755)
  • DuPont
  • American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
single-cell proteomics, label-free quantitative proteomics, Xenopus laevis embryos, zebrafish embryos, nanoelectrospray ionization, capillary electrophoresis, neural fate specification, lineage tracing
MeSH terms
Animals, Clone Cells, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Mass Spectrometry, Xenopus laevis, Zebrafish, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Xenopus Proteins, Zebrafish Proteins, Proteomics, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review