Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational Studies of Synthetically Relevant Homogeneous Organometallic Catalysis Involving Ni, Pd, Ir, and Rh: An Overview of Commonly Employed DFT Methods and Mechanistic Insights

Sperger, Theresa, Sanhueza, Italo A., Kalvet, Indrek, Schoenebeck, Franziska·2015·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTComputational Studies of Synthetically Relevant Homogeneous Organometallic Catalysis Involving Ni, Pd, Ir, and Rh: An Overview of Commonly Employed DFT Methods and Mechanistic InsightsTheresa Sperger†, Italo A. Sanhueza†‡, Indrek Kalvet†, and Franziska Schoenebeck*†View Author Information† Institute of Organic Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, Landoltweg 1, 52074 Aachen, Germany‡ Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 3, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 17, 9532–9586Publication Date (Web):July 24, 2015Publication History Received17 March 2015Published online24 July 2015Published inissue 9 September 2015https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00163https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00163review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views20605Altmetric-Citations474LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Chemical calculations,Hydrocarbons,Ligands,Oxidative addition,Selectivity Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00163

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Sperger, T., Sanhueza, I. A., Kalvet, I., & Schoenebeck, F.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2015-07-24
Volume
115
Issue
17
Pages
9532-9586
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W1926827464
Cited by
550
References
4
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Studies of Synthetically Relevant Homogeneous Organometallic Catalysis Involving Ni, Pd, Ir, and Rh: An Overview of Commonly Employed DFT Methods and Mechanistic Insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00163
The paper
Sperger, T., Sanhueza, I. A., Kalvet, I., & Schoenebeck, F. (2015). Computational Studies of Synthetically Relevant Homogeneous Organometallic Catalysis Involving Ni, Pd, Ir, and Rh: An Overview of Commonly Employed DFT Methods and Mechanistic Insights. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.