Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,009

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future

Kwak, Won-Jin, Rosy, Sharon, Daniel, Xia, Chun, Kim, Hun, Johnson, Lee R., Bruce, Peter G., Nazar, Linda F., Sun, Yang-Kook, Frimer, Aryeh A., Noked, Malachi, Freunberger, Stefan A., Aurbach, Doron·2020·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

The goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C requires a drastic reduction in CO 2 emissions across many sectors of the world economy. Batteries are vital to this endeavor, whether used in electric vehicles, to store renewable electricity, or in aviation. Present lithium-ion technologies are preparing the public for this inevitable change, but their maximum theoretical specific capacity presents a limitation. Their high cost is another concern for commercial viability. Metal–air batteries have the highest theoretical energy density of all possible secondary battery technologies and could yield step changes in energy storage, if their practical difficulties could be overcome. The scope of this review is to provide an objective, comprehensive, and authoritative assessment of the intensive work invested in nonaqueous rechargeable metal–air batteries over the past few years, which identified the key problems and guides directions to solve them. We focus primarily on the challenges and outlook for Li–O 2 cells but include Na–O 2, K–O 2, and Mg–O 2 cells for comparison. Our review highlights the interdisciplinary nature of this field that involves a combination of materials chemistry, electrochemistry, computation, microscopy, spectroscopy, and surface science. The mechanisms of O 2 reduction and evolution are considered in the light of recent findings, along with developments in positive and negative electrodes, electrolytes, electrocatalysis on surfaces and in solution, and the degradative effect of singlet oxygen, which is typically formed in Li–O 2 cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 1,009

Metadata

Authors
Kwak, W.-J., Rosy, Sharon, D., Xia, C., Kim, H., Johnson, L. R., Bruce, P. G., Nazar, L. F., Sun, Y.-K., Frimer, A. A., Noked, M., Freunberger, S. A., & Aurbach, D.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2020-03-05
Volume
120
Issue
14
Pages
6626-6683
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W3010008782
Cited by
1,009
References
6
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609
The paper
Kwak, W.-J., Rosy, Sharon, D., Xia, C., Kim, H., Johnson, L. R., Bruce, P. G., Nazar, L. F., Sun, Y.-K., Frimer, A. A., Noked, M., Freunberger, S. A., & Aurbach, D. (2020). Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.