The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future
Abstract
The goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C requires a drastic reduction in CO 2 emissions across many sectors of the world economy. Batteries are vital to this endeavor, whether used in electric vehicles, to store renewable electricity, or in aviation. Present lithium-ion technologies are preparing the public for this inevitable change, but their maximum theoretical specific capacity presents a limitation. Their high cost is another concern for commercial viability. Metal–air batteries have the highest theoretical energy density of all possible secondary battery technologies and could yield step changes in energy storage, if their practical difficulties could be overcome. The scope of this review is to provide an objective, comprehensive, and authoritative assessment of the intensive work invested in nonaqueous rechargeable metal–air batteries over the past few years, which identified the key problems and guides directions to solve them. We focus primarily on the challenges and outlook for Li–O 2 cells but include Na–O 2, K–O 2, and Mg–O 2 cells for comparison. Our review highlights the interdisciplinary nature of this field that involves a combination of materials chemistry, electrochemistry, computation, microscopy, spectroscopy, and surface science. The mechanisms of O 2 reduction and evolution are considered in the light of recent findings, along with developments in positive and negative electrodes, electrolytes, electrocatalysis on surfaces and in solution, and the degradative effect of singlet oxygen, which is typically formed in Li–O 2 cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Self-citationReviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Physical Mechanisms of Generation and Deactivation of Singlet Oxygen
Schweitzer, C., & Schmidt, R. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010371d · Cited by 2,123
Merritt, M. V., & Sawyer, D. T. (1970) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo00832a011 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707
Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems
Vivier, V., & Orazem, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876 · Cited by 615
Toward Practical High-Energy and High-Power Lithium Battery Anodes: Present and Future
Wang, C., Yang, C., & Zheng, Z. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202105213 · Cited by 337
Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Chen, Z.-X., Cheng, Q., Li, X.-Y., Li, Z., Song, Y.-W., Sun, F., Zhao, M., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Huang, J.-Q. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c02786 · Cited by 279
Ramakrishnan, S., Velusamy, D. B., Sengodan, S., Nagaraju, G., Kim, D. H., Kim, A. R., & Yoo, D. J. (2022) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120752 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwak, W.-J., Rosy, Sharon, D., Xia, C., Kim, H., Johnson, L. R., Bruce, P. G., Nazar, L. F., Sun, Y.-K., Frimer, A. A., Noked, M., Freunberger, S. A., & Aurbach, D.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-03-05
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 6626-6683
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W3010008782
- Cited by
- 1,009
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609
- The paper
- Kwak, W.-J., Rosy, Sharon, D., Xia, C., Kim, H., Johnson, L. R., Bruce, P. G., Nazar, L. F., Sun, Y.-K., Frimer, A. A., Noked, M., Freunberger, S. A., & Aurbach, D. (2020). Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.