Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Chen, Zi-Xian, Cheng, Qian, Li, Xi-Yao, Li, Zheng, Song, Yun-Wei, Sun, Furong, Zhao, Meng, Zhang, Xue-Qiang, Li, Bo-Quan, Huang, Jia-Qi·2023·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries afford great promise on achieving practical high energy density beyond lithium-ion batteries. Lean-electrolyte conditions constitute the prerequisite for achieving high-energy-density Li–S batteries but inevitably deteriorates battery performances, especially the sulfur cathode kinetics. Herein, the polarizations of the sulfur cathode are systematically decoupled to identify the key kinetic limiting factor in lean-electrolyte Li–S batteries. Concretely, an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy combined galvanostatic intermittent titration technique method is developed to decouple the cathodic polarizations into activation, concentration, and ohmic parts. Therein, activation polarization during lithium sulfide nucleation emerges as the dominant polarization as the electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio (E/S ratio) decreases, and the sluggish interfacial charge transfer kinetics is identified as the main reason for degraded cell performances under lean-electrolyte conditions. Accordingly, a lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide electrolyte is proposed to decrease activation polarization, and Li–S batteries adopting this electrolyte provide a discharge capacity of 985 mAh g –1 under a low E/S ratio of 4 μL mg –1 at 0.2 C. This work identifies the key kinetic limiting factor of lean-electrolyte Li–S batteries and provides guidance on designing rational promotion strategies to achieve advanced Li–S batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.3c02786

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z.-X., Cheng, Q., Li, X.-Y., Li, Z., Song, Y.-W., Sun, F., Zhao, M., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Huang, J.-Q.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2023-07-10
Volume
145
Issue
30
Pages
16449-16457
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W4383710720
Cited by
279
References
33
FWCI
20.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.3c02786
The paper
Chen, Z.-X., Cheng, Q., Li, X.-Y., Li, Z., Song, Y.-W., Sun, F., Zhao, M., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Huang, J.-Q. (2023). Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c02786

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.