Cited by 35Advanced Photocatalysis TechniquesTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsHybrid Renewable Energy Systems

Green Hydrogen Production in an Optofluidic Planar Microreactor via Photocatalytic Water Splitting under Visible/Simulated Sunlight Irradiation

Rao Pala, Laxmi Prasad, Peela, Nageswara Rao·2021·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

The visible light-active Pt/TiO 2 photocatalyst thin films were prepared by photo-depositing Pt onto the sol–gel TiO 2 spin-coated films. An optofluidic planar microreactor was fabricated using a Pt/TiO 2 film-coated glass substrate as the bottom plate and an uncoated glass substrate containing a planar reaction chamber as the cover plate. The Pt/TiO 2 thin films were tested for the photocatalytic water splitting activity in the presence of methanol as the sacrificial agent to produce hydrogen under visible/solar light irradiation. The effect of catalyst film thickness, reactant flow rate, light intensity, and type of light source on the rate of hydrogen production was studied. The Pt/TiO 2 film with a thickness of 1650 ± 119 nm showed a highest rate of 16.35 mmol h –1 g –1 (4.7 μmol h –1 cm –2 ) hydrogen production at an optimum reactant flow rate of 0.3 mL min –1 under visible light (400 W metal halide lamp) irradiation. The stability study carried out for four cycles of 5 h runs proved that the photocatalyst was stable and the film was well adhered to the glass substrate. A hydrogen production rate of 0.766 mmol h –1 g –1 (0.22 μmol h –1 cm –2 ) and a solar to hydrogen conversion efficiency of 0.015% were obtained under a simulated solar light irradiation of ∼100 mW cm –2 intensity, proving the solar light activity of the Pt/TiO 2 film.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02686

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao Pala, L. P., & Peela, N. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039, India
  • Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
Corresponding author
Peela, Nageswara Rao
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2021-11-16
Volume
35
Issue
23
Pages
19737-19747
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W3213393963
Cited by
35
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DST/TM/CERI/C19(G))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Keywords
green hydrogen production, photocatalytic water splitting, Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst, visible light photocatalysis, simulated sunlight, methanol sacrificial agent, solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, photocatalyst stability, catalyst film thickness, reactant flow rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review