Cited by 91Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesIndustrial Gas Emission ControlCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Functional Biochar Synergistic Solid/Liquid-Phase CO2 Capture: A Review

Zhang, Yu, Wang, Shizhang, Feng, Dongdong, Gao, Jianmin, Dong, Linhan, Zhao, Yijun, Sun, Shaozeng, Huang, Yudong +1 more·2022·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Nowadays, global warming is becoming more and more serious, while CO 2 capture technologies have emerged endlessly, with methods of solid-phase CO 2 capture for physical adsorption and liquid-phase CO 2 capture for chemical absorption. Biochar has been widely used to achieve CO 2 sequestration and emission reduction as a result of its wide range of precursor sources, strong adsorption, and rich surface functional groups. It reviews the existing post-combustion CO 2 capture solutions, focusing on the analysis of CO 2 capture technologies based on liquid-phase ammonia/monoethanolamine and solid-phase carbon-based materials. The former (liquid phase) is with limitation of capture efficiency as a result of strong volatility and thermal degradation, while the latter (solid phase) is accompanied by limited CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. The realization of synergy between the two would “learn from each other’s strengths” to improve the CO 2 adsorption ability. The review puts forward the concept of “biochar-functionalized cross-linking synergistic ammonia CO 2 capture technology”, which not only broadens the idea of multi-level utilization of biochar, significantly improving the liquid-phase (ammonia) CO 2 capture efficiency, but also has practical significance for the utilization of biomass waste and reduction of CO 2 emissions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04372

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Micropores play a more significant role than macropores and mesopores in CO2 adsorption because micropores enable stronger van der Waals force between CO2 molecules and biochar.

    “When it comes to CO 2 adsorption, micropores play a more significant role than macropores and mesopores. This is because micropores enable stronger van der Waals force between CO2 molecules and biochar (Zhang et al. 2022d).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Feng, D., Gao, J., Dong, L., Zhao, Y., Sun, S., Huang, Y., & Qin, Y.
Affiliations
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Feng, Dongdong
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2022-02-23
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
2945-2970
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W4229009504
Cited by
91
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (FRFCU5710051521)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M670908)
  • Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation (LBH-Z19151)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52006047)
  • Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering (2021-K05)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
biochar, CO2 capture, post-combustion carbon capture, monoethanolamine, solid-phase adsorption, crosslinking, CO2/N2 selectivity, biomass waste utilization, CO2 emission reduction, surface functional groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review