The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repurposing of Fruit Peel Waste as a Green Reductant for Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Open accessAbstract
The development of environmentally benign hydrometallurgical processes to treat spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a critical aspect of the electronic-waste circular economy. Herein, as an alternative to the highly explosive H 2 O 2, discarded orange peel powder (OP) is valorized as a green reductant for the leaching of industrially produced LIBs scraps in citric acid (H 3 Cit) lixiviant. The reductive potential of the cellulose- and antioxidant-rich OP was validated using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic) acid assays. Leaching parameters such as OP concentration (200 mg), processing temperature (100 °C), H 3 Cit concentration (1.5 M), reaction duration (4 h), and slurry density (25 g/mL) were systematically optimized to achieve 80–99% leaching efficiencies of Ni, Mn, Co, and Li from the LIB “black mass”. Importantly, solid side-streams generated by the OP-enabled leaching displayed negligible cytotoxicity in three different human cell lines, suggesting that the process is environmentally safe. As a proof of concept, Co(OH) 2 was selectively recovered from the green lixiviant and subsequently utilized to fabricate new batches of LiCoO 2 (LCO) coin cell batteries. Galvanostatic charge–discharge test revealed that the regenerated batteries exhibited initial charge and discharge values of 120 and 103 mAh/g, respectively, which is comparable to the performance of commercial LCO batteries. The use of fruit peel waste to recover valuable metals from spent LIBs is an effective, ecofriendly, and sustainable strategy to minimize the environmental footprint of both waste types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms
Bosecker, K. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x · Cited by 962
Food waste: a potential bioresource for extraction of nutraceuticals and bioactive compounds
Kumar, K., Yadav, A. N., Kumar, V., Vyas, P., & Dhaliwal, H. S. (2017) · Bioresources and Bioprocessing · doi:10.1186/s40643-017-0148-6 · Cited by 481
Ong, K. L., Kaur, G., Pensupa, N., Uisan, K., & Lin, C. S. K. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.076 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Mao, J., Ye, C., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Zeng, R., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00162d · Cited by 365
A review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the bioleaching approach
Roy, J. J., Cao, B., & Madhavi, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130944 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Soh, T., Chan, J. J., Meng, S., Meyer, D., Srinivasan, M., & Tay, C. Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-07-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 9681-9692
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W3041517943
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.