Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solving the Nonalignment of Methods and Approaches Used in Microplastic Research to Consistently Characterize Risk

Open access
Koelmans, Albert A., Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E, Mohamed Nor, Nur Hazimah, Kooi, Merel·2020·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The lack of standard approaches in microplastic research limits progress in the abatement of plastic pollution. Here, we propose and test rescaling methods that are able to improve the alignment of methods used in microplastic research. We describe a method to correct for the differences in size ranges as used by studies reporting microplastic concentrations and demonstrate how this reduces the variation in aqueous-phase concentrations caused by method differences. We provide a method to interchange between number, volume, and mass concentrations using probability density functions that represent environmental microplastic. Finally, we use this method to correct for the incompatibility of data as used in current species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), caused by differences in the microplastic types used in effect studies and those in nature. We derived threshold effect concentrations from such a corrected SSD for freshwater species. Comparison of the rescaled exposure concentrations and threshold effect concentrations reveals that the latter would be exceeded for 1.5% of the known surface water exposure concentrations worldwide. Altogether, this toolset allows us to correct for the diversity of microplastic, to address it in a common language, and to assess its risks as one environmental material.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.0c02982

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies., 2019, A Scientific Perspective on Microplastics in Nature and Society
  2. Kershaw, P. J.; Carney Almroth, B.; Villarrubia-Gómez, P.; Koelmans, A. A.; Gouin, T. Proceedings of the GESAMP International Workshop on assessing the risks associated with plastics and microplastics in the marine environment 2020, Vol. 103, p 68.
  3. Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects and Fate of Micro-plastic Marine Debris. Sept 9-11, 2008. NOAA TechnicalMemorandum NOS-OR&R-30 Arthur, C.; Baker, J.; Bamford, H., Eds.; 2009.
  4. Skåre, 2019, Microplastics; Occurrence, Levels and Implications for Environment and Human Health Related to Food. Opinion of the Steering Committee of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment
  5. Besseling, 2019, 2019. Correction to ‘Quantifying ecological risks of aquatic micro- and nanoplastic’, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 32, 10.1080/10643389.2019.1595472 · doi:10.1080/10643389.2019.1595472
  6. ECHA., 2008, Characterization of Dose [Concentration]-Response for Environment

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Koelmans, A. A., Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Mohamed Nor, N. H., & Kooi, M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2020-09-04
Volume
54
Issue
19
Pages
12307-12315
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W3083355867
Cited by
348
References
41
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (13940)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solving the Nonalignment of Methods and Approaches Used in Microplastic Research to Consistently Characterize Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.0c02982
The paper
Koelmans, A. A., Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Mohamed Nor, N. H., & Kooi, M. (2020). Solving the Nonalignment of Methods and Approaches Used in Microplastic Research to Consistently Characterize Risk. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02982

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.