Cited by 18Child Nutrition and Water AccessFecal contamination and water qualityWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Longitudinal Effects of a Sanitation Intervention on Environmental Fecal Contamination in a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh

Open access
Contreras, Jesse D., Islam, Mahfuza, Mertens, Andrew, Pickering, Amy J., Kwong, Laura H., Arnold, Benjamin F., Benjamin-Chung, Jade, Hubbard, Alan E. +8 more·2021·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Household latrine access generally is not associated with reduced fecal contamination in the environment, but its long-term effectiveness has not been measured. We conducted an environmental assessment nested within the WASH Benefits Bangladesh randomized controlled trial (NCT01590095). We quantified E. coli and fecal coliforms in samples of stored drinking water, child hands, mother hands, soil, and food among a random sample of households from the sanitation and control arms of the trial. Samples were collected during eight quarterly visits approximately 1–3.5 years after intervention initiation. Overall, there were no substantial differences in environmental fecal contamination between households enrolled in the sanitation and control arms. Statistically significant reductions were found in stored water and child hands after pooling across sampling rounds, but the effects were small and not consistent across rounds. In addition, we assessed potential effect modification of intervention effects by follow-up time, season, wealth, community-level latrine density and coverage, population density, and domestic animal ownership. While the intervention had statistically significant effects within some subgroups, there were no consistent patterns of effect modification. Our findings support a growing consensus that on-site latrines are insufficient to prevent fecal contamination in the rural household environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.1c01114

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contreras, J. D., Islam, M., Mertens, A., Pickering, A. J., Kwong, L. H., Arnold, B. F., Benjamin-Chung, J., Hubbard, A. E., Alam, M., Sen, D., Islam, S., Rahman, M., Unicomb, L., Luby, S. P., Colford, J. M., & Ercumen, A.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
  • Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States
Corresponding author
Contreras, Jesse D.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2021-06-04
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
8169-8179
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W3165364795
Cited by
18
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (0PPGD759)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01HD078912)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
household latrines, Escherichia coli, fecal coliforms, stored drinking water, hand hygiene, soil contamination, food contamination, effect modification, rural Bangladesh
MeSH terms
Animals, Bangladesh, Child, Escherichia coli, Feces, Humans, Rural Population, Sanitation, Toilet Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review