Lithium Concentration from Salt-Lake Brine by Donnan-Enhanced Nanofiltration
Open accessAbstract
Membranes offer a scalable and cost-effective approach to ion separations for lithium recovery. In the case of salt-lake brines, however, the high feed salinity and low pH of the post-treated feed have an uncertain impact on nanofiltration’s selectivity. Here, we adopt experimental and computational approaches to analyze the effect of pH and feed salinity and elucidate key selectivity mechanisms. Our data set comprises over 750 original ion rejection measurements, spanning five salinities and two pH levels, collected using brine solutions that model three salt-lake compositions. Our results demonstrate that the Li + /Mg 2+ selectivity of polyamide membranes can be enhanced by 13 times with acid-pretreated feed solutions. This selectivity enhancement is attributed to the amplified Donnan potential from the ionization of carboxyl and amino moieties under low solution pH. As feed salinities increase from 10 to 250 g L –1, the Li + /Mg 2+ selectivity decreases by ∼43%, a consequence of weakening exclusion mechanisms. Further, our analysis accentuates the importance of measuring separation factors using representative solution compositions to replicate the ion-transport behaviors with salt-lake brine. Consequently, our results reveal that predictions of ion rejection and Li + /Mg 2+ separation factors can be improved by up to 80% when feed solutions with the appropriate Cl – /SO 4 2– molar ratios are used.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The conventional nanofiltration process typically involves 10-20 times dilution of high-concentration brine with a large quantity of freshwater in the pre-treatment stage.
“the conventional NF process typically involves the 10–20 times dilution of high-concentration brine with a large quantity of freshwater in the pre-treatment stage14,27,28.”
From Solar-driven membrane separation for direct lithium extraction from artificial salt-lake brine (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Lithium recovery from brine: Recent developments and challenges
Khalil, A., Mohammed, S., Hashaikeh, R., & Hilal, N. (2022) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2022.115611 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Lithium Recovery Using Electrochemical Technologies: Advances and Challenges
Wu, L., Zhang, C., Kim, S., Hatton, T. A., Mo, H., & Waite, T. D. (2022) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118822 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Park, S. H., Kim, J. H., Moon, S. J., Jung, J. T., Wang, H. H., Ali, A., Quist-Jensen, C. A., Macedonio, F., Drioli, E., & Lee, Y. M. (2020) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117683 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Pramanik, B. K., Asif, M. B., Roychand, R., Shu, L., Jegatheesan, V., Bhuiyan, M., & Hai, F. I. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127623 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solar-driven membrane separation for direct lithium extraction from artificial salt-lake brine
Zhang, S., Wei, X., Cao, X., Peng, M., Wang, M., Jiang, L., & Jin, J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44625-w · Cited by 288 · see citing works
“Therefore, the conventional NF process typically involves the 10 – 20 times dilution of high-concentration brine with a largequantityoffreshwaterinthepre-treatmentstage 14,27,28 .”
Foo, Z. H., Thomas, J. B., Heath, S. M., Garcia, J. A., & Lienhard, J. H. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c04472 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Foo, Z. H., Rehman, D., Bouma, A. T., Monsalvo, S., & Lienhard, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lienhard, John H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-04-07
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6320-6330
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W4362692504
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National University of Singapore
- MIT Energy Initiative
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Keywords
- lithium recovery, salt lake brine, nanofiltration, Donnan potential, polyamide membranes, Li+/Mg2+ selectivity, pH effect, feed salinity, ion rejection, ion separation
- MeSH terms
- Lithium, Salts, Sodium Chloride, Lakes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review