The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Mineralization of Perfluorooctanoate by Electro-Fenton with H2O2 Electro-generated on Hierarchically Porous Carbon
Abstract
Perfluorochemicals are environmentally persistent, bioaccumulative, and globally distributed contaminants, which present potential toxicity to both humans and ecosystems. However, rapid mineralization of perfluorochemicals with cost-effective method remains great challenges. Here, an electro-Fenton system was reported for efficient mineralization of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), where H2O2 was electro-generated in situ from O2 reduction on hierarchically porous carbon (HPC). Benefited from the high H2O2 production rate (41.2-14.0 mM/h) of HPC, PFOA (50 mg/L) was rapidly degraded by electro-Fenton with first-order kinetic constants of 1.15-0.69 h(-1) at low potential (-0.4 V) in a wide range of pH (2-6). Meanwhile, PFOA was effectively mineralized, as revealed by a total organic carbon removal efficiency of 90.7-70.4% (-0.4 V, pH 2-6, 4 h). Moreover, the current efficiency of this electro-Fenton system for PFOA degradation was 1 order of magnitude higher than those of electrochemical oxidation. On the basis of the intermediate analysis, we proposed a possible mechanism for PFOA degradation: PFOA lost one electron to the anode and got decarboxylated. The formed perfluoroalkyl radical was mainly oxidized by hydroxyl radical, resulting in the formation of shorter chain perfluorocarboxylic acid, which followed the same reaction cycle as PFOA until it was mineralized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polyfluorinated Compounds: Past, Present, and Future
Lindstrom, A. B., Strynar, M. J., & Libelo, E. L. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2011622 · Cited by 1,628
Developmental Neurotoxicity of Perfluorinated Chemicals Modeled in Vitro
Slotkin, T. A., MacKillop, E. A., Melnick, R. L., Thayer, K. A., & Seidler, F. J. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11253 · Cited by 225
Route, W. T., Russell, R. E., Lindstrom, A. B., Strynar, M. J., & Key, R. L. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es501055d · Cited by 81
Cited by
Jiang, W.-L., Xia, X., Han, J.-L., Ding, Y.-C., Haider, M. R., & Wang, A.-J. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01894 · Cited by 293
Defects on CoS2−x: Tuning Redox Reactions for Sustainable Degradation of Organic Pollutants
Ji, J., Yan, Q., Yin, P., Mine, S., Matsuoka, M., & Xing, M. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202013015 · Cited by 280
Remediation of water from per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)–Challenges and perspectives
Garg, S., Wang, J., Kumar, P., Mishra, V., Arafat, H., Sharma, R. S., & Dumée, L. F. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105784 · Cited by 139
Hierarchically porous biochar for supercapacitor and electrochemical H2O2 production
Gao, M., Wang, W.-K., Zheng, Y.-M., Zhao, Q.-B., & Yu, H.-Q. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126171 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Chen, S., Quan, X., Yu, H., Zhao, H., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-10-27
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 13528-13533
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2291310265
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.