Cited by 154CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsEnzyme function and inhibitionCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Accelerating mineral carbonation using carbonic anhydrase

Power, Ian M., Harrison, Anna L., Dipple, Gregory M.·2016·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzymes have gained considerable attention for their potential use in carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologies because they are able to catalyze rapidly the interconversion of aqueous CO2 and bicarbonate. However, there are challenges for widespread implementation including the need to develop mineralization process routes for permanent carbon storage. Mineral carbonation of highly reactive feedstocks may be limited by the supply rate of CO2. This rate limitation can be directly addressed by incorporating enzyme-catalyzed CO2 hydration. This study examined the effects of bovine carbonic anhydrase (BCA) and CO2-rich gas streams on the carbonation rate of brucite [Mg(OH)2], a highly reactive mineral. Alkaline brucite slurries were amended with BCA and supplied with 10% CO2 gas while aqueous chemistry and solids were monitored throughout the experiments (hours to days). In comparison to controls, brucite carbonation using BCA was accelerated by up to 240%. Nesquehonite [MgCO3·3H2O] precipitation limited the accumulation of hydrated CO2 species, apparently preventing BCA from catalyzing the dehydration reaction. Geochemical models reproduce observed reaction progress in all experiments, revealing a linear correlation between CO2 uptake and carbonation rate. Data demonstrates that carbonation in BCA-amended reactors remained limited by CO2 supply, implying further acceleration is possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.5b04779

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Power, I. M., Harrison, A. L., & Dipple, G. M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Power, Ian M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
2610-2618
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2271612146
Cited by
154
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Carbon Management Canada
  • University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme function and inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
carbonic anhydrase, CO2 mineralization, CO2 capture, brucite, nesquehonite, CO2 hydration, CO2 sequestration, enzyme catalysis, magnesium hydroxide, geochemical modeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Dioxide, Carbonates, Carbonic Anhydrases, Cattle, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Magnesium Hydroxide, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Minerals, Models, Theoretical, Water, Carbon Sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review