Safely Managed Sanitation for All Means Fecal Sludge Management for At Least 1.8 Billion People in Low and Middle Income Countries
Abstract
Although global access to sanitation is increasing, safe management of fecal waste is a rapidly growing challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The goal of this study was to evaluate the current need for fecal sludge management (FSM) in LMICs by region, urban/rural status, and wealth. Recent Demographic and Health Survey data from 58 countries (847 685 surveys) were used to classify households by sanitation facility (facilities needing FSM, sewered facilities, ecological sanitation/other, or no facilities). Onsite piped water infrastructure was quantified to approximate need for wastewater management and downstream treatment. Over all surveyed nations, 63% of households used facilities requiring FSM, totaling approximately 1.8 billion people. Rural areas had similar proportions of toilets requiring FSM as urban areas. FSM needs scaled inversely with wealth: in the poorest quintile, households' sanitation facilities were almost 170 times more likely to require FSM (vs sewerage) than in the richest quintile. About one out of five households needing FSM had onsite piped water infrastructure, indicating domestic or reticulated wastewater infrastructure may be required if lacking for safe management of aqueous waste streams. FSM strategies must be included in future sanitation investment to achieve safe management of fecal wastes and protect public health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of sewered sanitation worldwide is not connected to adequate treatment of waste water, resulting in high environmental contamination with faeces and increased risks of diarrhoeal disease in adjacent communities.
“Furthermore, much of sewered sanitation worldwide is not connected to adequate treatment of waste water, which results in high environmental contamination with faeces and subsequently increased risks of diarrhoeal disease in adjacent communities.102, 103”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Baum, R., Luh, J., & Bartram, J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es304284f · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Slum Health: From Understanding to Action
Unger, A., & Riley, L. W. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040295 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Turley, R., Saith, R., Bhan, N., Rehfuess, E., & Carter, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wolf, J., Hubbard, S., Brauer, M., Ambelu, A., Arnold, B. F., Bain, R., Bauza, V., Brown, J., Caruso, B. A., Clasen, T., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00937-0 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Berendes, D. M., Sumner, T. A., & Brown, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berendes, David M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-02-14
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3074-3083
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2580877416
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
- Keywords
- fecal sludge management, sanitation access, low- and middle-income countries, household sanitation facilities, urban-rural differences, wealth inequality, wastewater management, ecological sanitation, sanitation investment
- MeSH terms
- Feces, Humans, Income, Rural Population, Sanitation, Sewage, Water Supply
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review