Cited by 85Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Biodegradation and uptake of the pesticide sulfluramid in a soil-carrot mesocosm

Zabaleta, Itsaso, Bizkarguenaga, Ekhine, Nunoo, Deborah B. O., Schultes, Lara, Leonel, Juliana, Prieto, Ailette, Zuloaga, Olatz, Benskin, Jonathan P.·2018·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamide (EtFOSA) is the active ingredient of Sulfluramid, a pesticide which is used extensively in South America for control of leaf-cutting ants. Despite being a known precursor to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), the importance of EtFOSA as a source of environmental PFOS remains unclear. In the present work, uptake, leaching, and biodegradation of EtFOSA and its transformation products were assessed over 81 days in soil-carrot ( Daucus carota ssp sativus) mesocosms for the first time. Experiments performed in the presence of carrot produced PFOS yields of up to 34% using a technical EtFOSA standard and up to 277% using Grão Forte, a commercial Sulfluramid bait formulation containing 0.0024% EtFOSA. Perfluorooctane sulfonamido acetate (FOSAA), perfluorooctane sulfonamide (FOSA), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) also formed over the course of the experiments, with the latter substance attributed to the presence of perfluorooctanamide impurities. The leachate contained low levels of transformation products and a high FOSA:PFOS ratio, consistent with recent observations in Brazilian surface water. In carrots, the more hydrophilic transformation products (e.g., PFOS) occurred primarily in the leaves, while the more hydrophobic products (e.g., FOSA, FOSAA, and EtFOSA) occurred in the peel and core. Remarkably, isomer-specific analysis revealed that the linear EtFOSA isomer biodegraded significantly faster than branched isomers. These data collectively…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b03876

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zabaleta, I., Bizkarguenaga, E., Nunoo, D. B. O., Schultes, L., Leonel, J., Prieto, A., Zuloaga, O., & Benskin, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Zabaleta, Itsaso
  • Bizkarguenaga, Ekhine
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
2603-2611
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2786938256
Cited by
85
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsr?det Formas (219-2013-794)
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
sulfluramid, PFOS, pesticide degradation, leaching, plant uptake, degradation intermediates, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorooctane sulfonamide, food contamination, leafy vegetables
MeSH terms
Brazil, Fluorocarbons, Pesticides, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Sulfonamides, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Daucus carota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review