The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Sulfate Radical Really Generated from Peroxydisulfate Activated by Iron(II) for Environmental Decontamination?
Abstract
It is well documented that the traditional Fenton reagent (i.e., the combination of Fe(II) and H 2 O 2 ) produces hydroxyl radical ( • OH) under acidic conditions, while at near-neutral pH the reactive intermediate converts to ferryl ion (Fe(IV)) that can oxidize sulfoxides to produce corresponding sulfones, markedly differing from their • OH-induced products. However, it remains unclear whether Fe(IV) is generated in the Fe(II) activated peroxydisulfate (PDS) process, where sulfate radical (SO 4 •– ) is long recognized as the dominant intermediate in literature. Here we demonstrated that SO 4 •– oxidized methyl phenyl sulfoxide (PMSO, a model sulfoxide) to produce biphenyl compounds rather than methyl phenyl sulfone (PMSO 2 ). Interestingly, the formation of PMSO 2 was observed when PMSO was treated by the Fe(II)/PDS system over a wide pH range, and the yields of PMSO 2 were quantified to be ∼100% at acidic pH 3–5. The identification of Fe(IV) in the Fe(II)/PDS system could also reasonably explain the literature results on alcohol scavenging effect and ESR spectra analysis. Further, a Fe(IV)-based kinetic model was shown to accurately simulate the experimental data. This work urges re-evaluation of the Fe(II)/PDS system for environmental decontamination, given that Fe(IV) would have different reactivity toward environmental contaminants compared with SO 4 •– and/or • OH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Insights into Heterogeneous Catalysis of Persulfate Activation on Dimensional-Structured Nanocarbons
Duan, X., Sun, H., Kang, J., Wang, Y., Indrawirawan, S., & Wang, S. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b00774 · Cited by 799
Katsoyiannis, I. A., Ruettimann, T., & Hug, S. J. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es800649p · Cited by 463
Cited by
Origins of Electron-Transfer Regime in Persulfate-Based Nonradical Oxidation Processes
Ren, W., Cheng, C., Shao, P., Luo, X., Zhang, H., Wang, S., & Duan, X. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c05374 · Cited by 1,306
Yan, Q., Lian, C., Huang, K., Liang, L., Yu, H., Yin, P., Zhang, J., & Xing, M. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202105736 · Cited by 508
Zong, Y., Shao, Y., Zeng, Y., Shao, B., Xu, L., Zhao, Z., Liu, W., & Wu, D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00375 · Cited by 499
Chen, F., Liu, L.-L., Chen, J.-J., Li, W.-W., Chen, Y.-P., Zhang, Y.-J., Wu, J.-H., Mei, S.-C., Yang, Q., & Yu, H.-Q. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116799 · Cited by 482
Chen, F., Huang, G.-X., Yao, F.-B., Yang, Q., Zheng, Y.-M., Zhao, Q.-B., & Yu, H.-Q. (2020) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115559 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Jiang, J., Pang, S., Zhou, Y., Guan, C., Gao, Y., Li, J., Yang, Y., Qiu, W., & Jiang, C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-09-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11276-11284
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2889887347
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.