Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of Selective Ion Removal in Membrane Capacitive Deionization for Water Softening

Wang, Li, Lin, Shihong·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Capacitive deionization (CDI) is an emerging technology capable of selective removal of ions from water. While many studies have reported chemically tailored electrodes for selective ion removal, the selective removal of divalent cations (i.e., hardness) over monovalent cations can simply be achieved using membrane CDI (MCDI) equipped with ion exchange membranes (IEMs). In this study, we use both experimental and modeling approaches to systematically investigate the selective removal of Ca 2+ over Na + . Specifically, the impacts of current density, hydraulic retention time, and feed composition on the selectivity of Ca 2+ over Na + were investigated. The results from our study suggest a universal correlation between the ratio of molar fluxes and the ratio of spacer channel ion concentrations, regardless of operating conditions and feed composition. Our analysis also reveals inherent and universal trade-off relationships between selectivity and the Ca 2+ removal rate and between selectivity and the degree of Ca 2+ removal. This fundamental understanding of the mechanism of selective ion removal in MCDI can also be applied to flow-electrode CDI processes that employ IEMs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.9b00655

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., & Lin, S.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-04-23
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
5797-5804
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2940852956
Cited by
172
References
1
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.