The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Singlet Oxygen Triggered by Superoxide Radicals in a Molybdenum Cocatalytic Fenton Reaction with Enhanced REDOX Activity in the Environment
Abstract
As an important reactive oxygen species (ROS) with selective oxidation, singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) has wide application prospects in biology and the environment. However, the mechanism of 1 O 2 formation, especially the conversion of superoxide radicals (·O 2 – ) to 1 O 2, has been a great controversy. This process is often disturbed by hydroxyl radicals (·OH). Here, we develop a molybdenum cocatalytic Fenton system, which can realize the transformation from ·O 2 – to 1 O 2 on the premise of minimizing ·OH. The Mo 0 exposed on the surface of molybdenum powder can significantly improve the Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ cycling efficiency and weaken the production of ·OH, leading to the generation of ·O 2 – . Meanwhile, the exposed Mo 6+ can realize the transformation of ·O 2 – to 1 O 2 . The molybdenum cocatalytic effect makes the conventional Fenton reaction have high oxidation activity for the remediation of organic pollutants and prompts the inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus, as well as the adsorption and reduction of heavy metal ions (Cu 2+, Ni 2+, and Cr 6+ ). Compared with iron powder, molybdenum powder is more likely to promote the conversion from Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ during the Fenton reaction, resulting in a higher Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ ratio and better activity regarding the remediation of organics. Our findings clarify the transformation mechanism from ·O 2 – to 1 O 2 during the Fenton-like reaction and provide a promising REDOX Fenton-like system for water treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen
Lambeth, J. D. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1312 · Cited by 3,125
Kanti Das, T., Wati, M. R., & Fatima-Shad, K. (2014) · Archives of Neuroscience · doi:10.5812/archneurosci.20078 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Yan, Q., Lian, C., Huang, K., Liang, L., Yu, H., Yin, P., Zhang, J., & Xing, M. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202105736 · Cited by 508
Self-citationHe, S., Yan, C., Chen, X.-Z., Wang, Z., Ouyang, T., Guo, M.-L., & Liu, Z.-Q. (2020) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119138 · Cited by 281
Defects on CoS2−x: Tuning Redox Reactions for Sustainable Degradation of Organic Pollutants
Ji, J., Yan, Q., Yin, P., Mine, S., Matsuoka, M., & Xing, M. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202013015 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yi, Q., Ji, J., Shen, B., Dong, C., Liu, J., Zhang, J., & Xing, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-07-23
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9725-9733
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2963660325
- Cited by
- 834
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.