The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Review on the Chemotherapeutic Potential of Piceatannol for Cancer Treatment, with Mechanistic Insights
Abstract
Cancer is a diverse class of diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth that constitutes the greatest cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite steady progress, the treatment modalities of cancer are still insufficient. Several new concepts have emerged for therapeutic intervention in malignant diseases with the goal of identifying specific targets and overcoming resistance against current cytotoxic therapies. Many studies have reported the remarkable and significant properties of dietary plant polyphenols such as curcumin, resveratrol, flavopiridol, indirubin, magnolol, piceatannol, parthenolide, epigallocatechin gallate, and cucurbitacin as anticancer agents known for their pleiotropic effects on cancer, immune cells, and inflammation. Piceatannol, an analogue and metabolite of resveratrol, is a natural stilbene commonly found in grape skins and wine. Compared to resveratrol, this molecule exhibits superior bioactivities as an inhibitor of COX-1/2 and the CSN-associated kinase. Piceatannol is thought to be a potent natural compound with many therapeutic effects, such as the prevention of hypercholesterolemia, arrhythmia, atherosclerosis, angiogenesis, and cardiovascular diseases. It also demonstrates vasorelaxation, antioxidant, and anticancer activities. This comprehensive review summarizes the current data regarding the mechanisms of action of piceatannol, its chemopreventive properties, and its possible therapeutic potential against various types of human cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mans, D. R. A., Rocha, A. B., & Schwartsmann, G. (2000) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-3-185 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Polyphenols: Extraction Methods, Antioxidative Action, Bioavailability and Anticarcinogenic Effects
Brglez Mojzer, E., Knez Hrnčič, M., Škerget, M., Knez, Ž., & Bren, U. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21070901 · Cited by 1,096
Luteolin, a flavonoid, as an anticancer agent: A review
Imran, M., Rauf, A., Abu-Izneid, T., Nadeem, M., Shariati, M. A., Khan, I. A., Imran, A., Orhan, I. E., Rizwan, M., Atif, M., et al. (2019) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108612 · Cited by 931
Formation and Biological Targets of Quinones: Cytotoxic versus Cytoprotective Effects
Bolton, J. L., & Dunlap, T. (2017) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00256 · Cited by 522
Biological Activities of Stilbenoids
Akinwumi, B., Bordun, K.-A., & Anderson, H. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19030792 · Cited by 373
de Lima, R. M. T., dos Reis, A. C., de Menezes, A. P. M., Santos, J. V. D. O., Filho, J. W. G. D. O., Ferreira, J. R. D. O., de Alencar, M. V. O. B., da Mata, A. M. O. F., Khan, I. N., Islam, A., et al. (2018) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.6134 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Seyed, M. A., Jantan, I., Bukhari, S. N. A., & Vijayaraghavan, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-01-26
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 725-737
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2236820427
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Review on the Chemotherapeutic Potential of Piceatannol for Cancer Treatment, with Mechanistic Insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05993
- The paper
- Seyed, M. A., Jantan, I., Bukhari, S. N. A., & Vijayaraghavan, K. (2016). A Comprehensive Review on the Chemotherapeutic Potential of Piceatannol for Cancer Treatment, with Mechanistic Insights. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.