Cited by 101Innovative Teaching MethodsChemistry Education and ResearchVarious Chemistry Research Topics

High Structure Active Learning Pedagogy for the Teaching of Organic Chemistry: Assessing the Impact on Academic Outcomes

Crimmins, Michael T., Midkiff, Brooke·2017·Journal of Chemical Education

Abstract

Organic Chemistry is a required course for programs in chemistry, biology, and many health science careers. It has historically been considered a highly challenging course with significant failure rates. As with many science disciplines, the teaching of Organic Chemistry has traditionally focused on unstructured exposition-centered delivery of course material. This report details efforts to transform the teaching of a large section of Organic Chemistry to a more student-centered approach through the use of a highly structured, active learning format. In this study, the authors examine student performance data on homogeneous examinations and course grades for two groups of students at a large public university for comparison between those that received highly structured active learning pedagogy and those that received traditional, unstructured, lecture pedagogy in Organic Chemistry. Data consist of repeated cross sections over 4 different years, with a total sample size n = 766. Regression and propensity score matching (PSM) are used to analyze student academic outcomes. Results suggest that students exposed to a highly structured, active learning pedagogy in Organic Chemistry scored statistically significantly higher on total points earned and final exam scores, and had a higher probability of an increase in their final course grade. Results further suggest that while increased structure in conjunction with active learning improved outcomes generally for all students who received it, those students at the lowest academic achievement levels experienced the most gains. This study is significant in its causal analysis of the impact of highly structured active learning on academic outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00663

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crimmins, M. T., & Midkiff, B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Crimmins, Michael T.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
429-438
ISSN
  • 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1328
OpenAlex
W2587462225
Cited by
101
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 4
FWCI
38.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
Keywords
organic chemistry education, active learning, student-centered learning, lecture method, educational outcomes, course grades, final exam performance, low-achieving students, course failure rates, teaching reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review