Cited by 433Computational Drug Discovery MethodsHistory and advancements in chemistryMachine Learning in Materials Science

Computationally Efficient Algorithm to Identify Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) in Large Data Sets

Hussain, Jameed, Rea, Ceara·2010·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

Modern drug discovery organizations generate large volumes of SAR data. A promising methodology that can be used to mine this chemical data to identify novel structure-activity relationships is the matched molecular pair (MMP) methodology. However, before the full potential of the MMP methodology can be utilized, a MMP identification method that is capable of identifying all MMPs in large chemical data sets on modest computational hardware is required. In this paper we report an algorithm that is capable of systematically generating all MMPs in chemical data sets. Additionally, the algorithm is computationally efficient enough to be applied on large data sets. As an example the algorithm was used to identify the MMPs in the approximately 300k NIH MLSMR set. The algorithm identified approximately 5.3 million matched molecular pairs in the set. These pairs cover approximately 2.6 million unique molecular transformations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci900450m

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussain, J., & Rea, C.
Affiliations
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Hussain, Jameed
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
339-348
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2005518172
Cited by
420
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
matched molecular pairs, structure-activity relationship, computational efficiency, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Structure-Activity Relationship, Databases, Factual, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review