Benchmarking data sets for the evaluation of virtual ligand screening methods: review and perspectives.

Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints

Rogers, D. O. W., & Hahn, M. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100050t · Cited by 7,597 · see citing works

Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen

Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897 · Cited by 6,763 · see citing works

ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery

Gaulton, A., Bellis, L. J., Bento, A. P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., Light, Y., McGlinchey, S., Michalovich, D., Al-Lazikani, B., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr777 · Cited by 4,382 · see citing works

ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening

Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci049714+ · Cited by 4,058 · see citing works

How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge

Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3078 · Cited by 3,566 · see citing works

A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm

Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836 · see citing works

Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.

Mysinger, M. M., Carchia, M., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300687e · Cited by 2,412 · see citing works

A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions

Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,287 · see citing works

BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities

Liu, T., Lin, Y., Wen, X., Jorissen, R. N., & Gilson, M. K. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl999 · Cited by 2,145 · see citing works

Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes

Eldridge, M., Murray, C. W., Auton, T. R., Paolini, G. V., & Mee, R. P. (1997) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1007996124545 · Cited by 1,692 · see citing works

Surflex: Fully Automatic Flexible Molecular Docking Using a Molecular Similarity-Based Search Engine

Jain, A. N. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020406h · Cited by 1,351 · see citing works

Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Huang, N., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0608356 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works

PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities

Bolton, E., Wang, Y., Thiessen, P. A., & Bryant, S. H. (2008) · Annual reports in computational chemistry · doi:10.1016/s1574-1400(08)00012-1 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works

The PDBbind Database: Collection of Binding Affinities for Protein−Ligand Complexes with Known Three-Dimensional Structures

Wang, R., Fang, X., Lu, Y., & Wang, S. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030580l · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works

A General and Fast Scoring Function for Protein−Ligand Interactions: A Simplified Potential Approach

Muegge, I., & Martin, Y. C. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm980536j · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works

Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening

Bajorath, J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd941 · Cited by 935 · see citing works

DOCK 6: Combining techniques to model RNA–small molecule complexes

Lang, P. T., Brozell, S. R., Mukherjee, S., Pettersen, E. F., Meng, E. C., Thomas, V., Rizzo, R. C., Case, D. A., James, T. L., & Kuntz, I. D. (2009) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.1563609 · Cited by 747 · see citing works

Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1, evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations.

Bissantz, C., Folkers, G., & Rognan, D. (2000) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm001044l · Cited by 740 · see citing works

Prediction of Protein−Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps

Leach, A. R., Shoichet, B. K., & Peishoff, C. E. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm060999m · Cited by 648 · see citing works

Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence

Dorigo, M., Stützle, T., Poli, R., Martinoli, A., Gambardella, L. M., & Birattari, M. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11839088 · Cited by 529 · see citing works

Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go

Moitessier, N., Englebienne, P., Lee, D., Lawandi, J., & Corbeil, C. R. (2008) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707515 · Cited by 514 · see citing works

The cost of drug development: a systematic review.

Morgan, S. G., Grootendorst, P., Lexchin, J., Cunningham, C., & Greyson, D. L. (2011) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.12.002 · Cited by 510 · see citing works

Gaussian docking functions

McGann, M. R., Almond, H. R., Nicholls, A. O., Grant, J., & Brown, F. K. (2002) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.10207 · Cited by 493 · see citing works

Detailed Analysis of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening

Ståhl, M., & Rarey, M. (2001) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0003992 · Cited by 490 · see citing works

Molecular Docking and High-Throughput Screening for Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B

Doman, T. N., McGovern, S. L., Witherbee, B. J., Kasten, T. P., Kurumbail, R. G., Stallings, W. C., Connolly, D. T., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm010548w · Cited by 463 · see citing works

Structure−Activity Relationships for a Large Diverse Set of Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental Estrogens

Fang, H., Tong, W., Shi, L. M., Blair, R., Perkins, R., Branham, W. S., Hass, B. S., Xie, Q., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., et al. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx000208y · Cited by 449 · see citing works

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Analyses Using Comparative Molecular Field Analysis and Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis To Elucidate Selectivity Differences of Inhibitors Binding to Trypsin, Thrombin, and Factor Xa

Böhm, M., Stürzebecher, J., & Klebe, G. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm981062r · Cited by 440 · see citing works

Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection—What can we learn from earlier mistakes?

Kirchmair, J., Markt, P., Distinto, S., Wolber, G., & Langer, T. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-007-9163-6 · Cited by 423 · see citing works

Maximum Unbiased Validation (MUV) Data Sets for Virtual Screening Based on PubChem Bioactivity Data

Rohrer, S. G., & Baumann, K. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci8002649 · Cited by 403 · see citing works

Virtual Screening Using Protein−Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment

Verdonk, M. L., Berdini, V., Hartshorn, M. J., Mooij, W. T. M., Murray, C. W., Taylor, R. D., & Watson, P. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci034289q · Cited by 379 · see citing works

Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking

Mysinger, M. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100214a · Cited by 323 · see citing works

Novel 4-Anilinoquinazolines with C-7 Basic Side Chains: Design and Structure Activity Relationship of a Series of Potent, Orally Active, VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Hennequin, L. F., Stokes, E. S. E., Thomas, A. P., Johnstone, C., Plé, P. A., Ogilvie, D., Dukes, M., Wedge, S. R., Kendrew, J., & Curwen, J. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm011022e · Cited by 311 · see citing works

PLANTS: Application of Ant Colony Optimization to Structure-Based Drug Design

Korb, O., Stützle, T., & Exner, T. E. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11839088_22 · Cited by 288 · see citing works

Information Decay in Molecular Docking Screens against Holo, Apo, and Modeled Conformations of Enzymes

McGovern, S. L., & Shoichet, B. K. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0300330 · Cited by 276 · see citing works

Structure-Activity Relationships in Purine-Based Inhibitor Binding to HSP90 Isoforms

Wright, L. M., Barril, X., Dymock, B. W., Sheridan, L., Surgenor, A. E., Beswick, M., Drysdale, M., Collier, A. J., Massey, A., Davies, N., et al. (2004) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.03.033 · Cited by 268 · see citing works

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluations of Substituted 3-[(3- or 4-Carboxyethylpyrrol-2-yl)methylidenyl]indolin-2-ones as Inhibitors of VEGF, FGF, and PDGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Sun, L., Tran, N., Liang, C., Tang, F. L. M., Rice, A. G., Schreck, R., Waltz, K., Shawver, L. K., McMahon, G., & Tang, C. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9904295 · Cited by 261 · see citing works

Virtual Screening of Molecular Databases Using a Support Vector Machine

Jorissen, R. N., & Gilson, M. K. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci049641u · Cited by 258 · see citing works

SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex

Wang, R., Liu, L., Lai, L., & Youqi, T. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s008940050096 · Cited by 249 · see citing works

An ant colony optimization approach to flexible protein–ligand docking

Korb, O., Stützle, T., & Exner, T. E. (2007) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-007-0006-9 · Cited by 246 · see citing works

Design and Structure−Activity Relationship of a New Class of Potent VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Hennequin, L. F., Thomas, A. P., Johnstone, C., Stokes, E. S. E., Plé, P. A., Lohmann, J.-J. M., Ogilvie, D., Dukes, M., Wedge, S. R., Curwen, J., et al. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm990345w · Cited by 244 · see citing works

A Comparison of Methods for Modeling Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationships

Sutherland, J. J., O’Brien, L. A., & Weaver, D. F. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0497141 · Cited by 230 · see citing works

Discovery of 3-[(4,5,7-Trifluorobenzothiazol-2-yl)methyl]indole-N-acetic Acid (Lidorestat) and Congeners as Highly Potent and Selective Inhibitors of Aldose Reductase for Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Complications

Zandt, M. C. V., Jones, M. L., Gunn, D., Geraci, L. S., Jones, J. H., Sawicki, D. R., Sredy, J., JACOT, J. L., DiCioccio, A. T., Petrova, T. E., et al. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0492094 · Cited by 230 · see citing works

Novel, Potent Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Molecular Chaperone Hsp90 Discovered through Structure-Based Design

Dymock, B. W., Barril, X., Brough, P. A., Cansfield, J. E., Massey, A. J., McDonald, E., Hubbard, R. E., Surgenor, A. E., Roughley, S. D., Webb, P., et al. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050355z · Cited by 227 · see citing works

Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0 – A public library of challenging docking benchmark sets.

Bauer, M. R., Ibrahim, T. M., Vogel, S. M., & Boeckler, F. M. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400115b · Cited by 200 · see citing works

Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Good, A. C., & Oprea, T. I. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-007-9167-2 · Cited by 180 · see citing works

The holistic integration of virtual screening in drug discovery

Tanrikulu, Y., Krüger, B., & Proschak, E. (2013) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.01.007 · Cited by 178 · see citing works

Community benchmarks for virtual screening

Irwin, J. J. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-008-9189-4 · Cited by 171 · see citing works

How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps

Hawkins, P. C. D., Warren, G. L., Skillman, A. G., & Nicholls, A. O. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-007-9166-3 · Cited by 166 · see citing works

Predicting Binding Affinities of Protein Ligands from Three-Dimensional Models: Application to Peptide Binding to Class I Major Histocompatibility Proteins

Rognan, D., Lauemøller, S. L., Holm, A., Buus, S., & Tschinke, V. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9910775 · Cited by 165 · see citing works

Essential considerations for using protein–ligand structures in drug discovery

Warren, G. L., Do, T. D., Kelley, B. P., Nicholls, A. O., & Warren, S. D. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.06.011 · Cited by 161 · see citing works

Application of crystallographic and modeling methods in the design of purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitors.

Ealick, S. E., Babu, Y. S., Bugg, C. E., Erion, M. D., Guida, W. C., Montgomery, J. A. J., & Secrist, J. A. I. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11540 · Cited by 154 · see citing works

Parameter Estimation for Scoring Protein−Ligand Interactions Using Negative Training Data

Pham, T. A., & Jain, A. N. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050040j · Cited by 145 · see citing works

Hierarchical Docking of Databases of Multiple Ligand Conformations

Lorber, D. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026054637683 · Cited by 145 · see citing works

Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening by Multivariate Analysis of Scoring Data

Jacobsson, M., Lidén, P., Stjernschantz, E., Boström, H., & Norinder, U. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030896t · Cited by 126 · see citing works

Virtual Screening against Metalloenzymes for Inhibitors and Substrates

Irwin, J. J., Raushel, F. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi050801k · Cited by 121 · see citing works

Structure-Based Discovery of a Novel, Noncovalent Inhibitor of AmpC β-Lactamase

Powers, R. A., Morandi, F., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00799-2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works

Kinases, Homology Models, and High Throughput Docking

Diller, D., & Li, R. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020503a · Cited by 120 · see citing works

Fast Structure-Based Virtual Ligand Screening Combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex

Miteva, M. A., Lee, W. H., Montès, M., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050262h · Cited by 111 · see citing works

Managing bias in ROC curves

Clark, R. D., & Webster-Clark, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-008-9181-z · Cited by 110 · see citing works

Ligand and Decoy Sets for Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Gatica, E. A., & Cavasotto, C. N. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200412p · Cited by 106 · see citing works

Decoys for Docking

Graves, A. P., Brenk, R., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0491187 · Cited by 105 · see citing works

DEKOIS: Demanding Evaluation Kits for Objective in Silico Screening — A Versatile Tool for Benchmarking Docking Programs and Scoring Functions

Vogel, S., Bauer, M. R., & Boeckler, F. M. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci2001549 · Cited by 94 · see citing works

Optimal assignment methods for ligand-based virtual screening

Jahn, A., Hinselmann, G., Fechner, N., & Zell, A. (2009) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-1-14 · Cited by 94 · see citing works

Novel inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase/PARP1 and PARP2 identified using a cell-based screen in yeast.

Perkins, E. L., Sun, D., Nguyen, A., Tulac, S., Francesco, M., Tavana, H., Nguyen, H., Tugendreich, S., Barthmaier, P., Couto, J., et al. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 91 · see citing works

Scaffold Hopping Using Two-Dimensional Fingerprints: True Potential, Black Magic, or a Hopeless Endeavor? Guidelines for Virtual Screening

Vogt, M., Stumpfe, D., Geppert, H., & Bajorath, J. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100492z · Cited by 89 · see citing works

Estimating Error Rates in Bioactivity Databases

Tiikkainen, P., Bellis, L. J., Light, Y., & Franke, L. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400099q · Cited by 68 · see citing works

Virtual Screening for Kinase Targets

Muegge, I., & Enyedy, I. J. (2004) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867043455684 · Cited by 65 · see citing works

Measuring CAMD technique performance: A virtual screening case study in the design of validation experiments

Good, A. C., Hermsmeier, M. A., & Hindle, S. A. (2004) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-004-4067-1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works

Structure-Based Optimization of a Non-β-lactam Lead Results in Inhibitors That Do Not Up-Regulate β-Lactamase Expression in Cell Culture

Tondi, D., Morandi, F., Bonnet, R., Costi, M. P., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja042984o · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Comparative Evaluation of 3D Virtual Ligand Screening Methods: Impact of the Molecular Alignment on Enrichment

Giganti, D. O., Guillemain, H., Spadoni, J., Nilges, M., Zagury, J., & Montès, M. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900507g · Cited by 63 · see citing works

Hierarchical Database Screenings for HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Using a Pharmacophore Model, Rigid Docking, Solvation Docking, and MM−PB/SA

Wang, J., Kang, X., Kuntz, I. D., & Kollman, P. A. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049606e · Cited by 63 · see citing works

Virtual Decoy Sets for Molecular Docking Benchmarks

Wallach, I., & Lilien, R. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100374f · Cited by 58 · see citing works

NRLiSt BDB, the Manually Curated Nuclear Receptors Ligands and Structures Benchmarking Database

Lagarde, N., Nasr, N. B., Jérémie, A., Guillemain, H., Laville, V., Labib, T., Zagury, J., & Montès, M. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500132p · Cited by 57 · see citing works

An Unbiased Method To Build Benchmarking Sets for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening and its Application To GPCRs

Xia, J., Jin, H., Liu, Z., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. S. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500062f · Cited by 56 · see citing works

Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening

Xia, J., Tilahun, E. L., Reid, T.-E. R., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. S. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.015 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of 3,4-Dihydro-2H-[1,4]diazepino[6,7,1-hi]indol-1-ones as Inhibitors of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase

Tikhe, J. G., Webber, S. E., Hostomský, Z., Maegley, K. A., Ekkers, A., Li, J., Yu, X., Almassy, R. J., Kumpf, R. A., Boritzki, T. J., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030513r · Cited by 48 · see citing works

Development of KiBank, a database supporting structure-based drug design

Zhang, J., Aizawa, M., Amari, S., Iwasawa, Y., Nakano, T., & Nakata, K. (2004) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.09.003 · Cited by 48 · see citing works

Efficient treatment of out-of-plane bend and improper torsion interactions in MM2, MM3, and MM4 molecular mechanics calculations

Tuzun, R. E., Noid, D. W., & Sumpter, B. G. (1997) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19971115)18:14 · Cited by 48 · see citing works

Protein Structures in Virtual Screening: A Case Study with CDK2

THOMAS, M. P., McInnes, C., & Fischer, P. M. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050554i · Cited by 43 · see citing works

Effective Virtual Screening Strategy toward Covalent Ligands: Identification of Novel NEDD8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitors

Zhang, S., Tan, J., Lai, Z., Li, Y., Pang, J., Xiao, J., Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Ji, H., & Lai, Y. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci5002058 · Cited by 41 · see citing works

Protein Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 5-Thia-2,6-diamino-4(3H)-oxopyrimidines: Potent Inhibitors of Glycinamide Ribonucleotide Transformylase with Potent Cell Growth Inhibition

Varney, M. D., Palmer, C. L., Romines, W. H., Boritzki, T. J., Margosiak, S. A., Almassy, R. J., Janson, C. A., Bartlett, C. A., Howland, E. J., & Ferre, R. (1997) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9607459 · Cited by 38 · see citing works

Multiple Structures for Virtual Ligand Screening: Defining Binding Site Properties-Based Criteria to Optimize the Selection of the Query

Nasr, N. B., Guillemain, H., Lagarde, N., Zagury, J., & Montès, M. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci3004557 · Cited by 35 · see citing works

Impact of Benchmark Data Set Topology on the Validation of Virtual Screening Methods: Exploration and Quantification by Spatial Statistics

Rohrer, S. G., & Baumann, K. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci700099u · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Comparative Modeling and Benchmarking Data Sets for Human Histone Deacetylases and Sirtuin Families

Xia, J., Tilahun, E. L., Kebede, E. H., Reid, T.-E. R., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. S. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci5005515 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Development of a Method To Consistently Quantify the Structural Distance between Scaffolds and To Assess Scaffold Hopping Potential

Li‐Gao, R., Stumpfe, D., Vogt, M., Geppert, H., & Bajorath, J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci2003945 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Identification of Novel Potential Antibiotics against Staphylococcus Using Structure-Based Drug Screening Targeting Dihydrofolate Reductase

Kobayashi, M., Kinjo, T., Koseki, Y., Bourne, C. R., Barrow, W. W., & Aoki, S. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400686d · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Toward a Benchmarking Data Set Able to Evaluate Ligand- and Structure-based Virtual Screening Using Public HTS Data

Lindh, M., Svensson, F., Schaal, W., Zhang, J., Sköld, C., Brandt, P., & Karlén, A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci5005465 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

REPROVIS-DB: A Benchmark System for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Derived from Reproducible Prospective Applications

Ripphausen, P., Wassermann, A. M., & Bajorath, J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200309j · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Discovery of potential and selective COX-1 inhibitory leads using pharmacophore modelling, in silico screening and in vitro evaluation

Balaji, B., Hariharan, S., Shah, D. B., & Ramanathan, M. (2014) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.09.005 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

Screening of synthetic and natural product databases: Identification of novel androgens and antiandrogens

Bobach, C., Tennstedt, S., Palberg, K., Denkert, A., Brandt, W., de Meijere, A., Seliger, B., & Wessjohann, L. A. (2014) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.11.026 · Cited by 18 · see citing works

Utilization of Human Nuclear Receptors as an Early Counter Screen for Off-Target Activity: A Case Study with a Compendium of 615 Known Drugs

Fan, F., Hu, R., Munzli, A., Chen, Y., Dunn, R. T., Weikl, K., Strauch, S., Schwandner, R., Afshari, C. A., Hamadeh, H. K., et al. (2015) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfv052 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

Importance of the Pharmacological Profile of the Bound Ligand in Enrichment on Nuclear Receptors: Toward the Use of Experimentally Validated Decoy Ligands

Lagarde, N., Zagury, J., & Montès, M. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500305c · Cited by 9 · see citing works

Systematic assessment of scaffold distances in ChEMBL: prioritization of compound data sets for scaffold hopping analysis in virtual screening

Li‐Gao, R., & Bajorath, J. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-012-9603-9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules

Bartók, A. P., De, S., Poelking, C., Bernstein, N., Kermode, J. R., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701816 · Cited by 764 · see citing works

Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: methods, tools and databases

Rifaioğlu, A. S., Ataş, H., Martin, M. J., Çetin-Atalay, R., Atalay, V., & Doğan, T. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bby061 · Cited by 535 · see citing works

AtomNet: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Bioactivity Prediction in Structure-based Drug DiscoveryPreprint

Wallach, I., Dzamba, M., & Heifets, A. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.02855 · Cited by 698 · see citing works

Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges

Guedes, I. A., Pereira, F. S. S., & Dardenne, L. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01089 · Cited by 331 · see citing works

Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations

Liu, K., Watanabe, E., & Kokubo, H. (2017) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-016-0005-2 · Cited by 272 · see citing works

Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: applications and techniques

Deng, J., Yang, Z., Ojima, I., Samaras, D., & Wang, F. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab430 · Cited by 236 · see citing works

Pharmacophore Models and Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening: Concepts and Applications Exemplified on Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases

Kaserer, T., Beck, K. R., Akram, M., Odermatt, A., & Schuster, D. (2015) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules201219880 · Cited by 208 · see citing works

Predicting or Pretending: Artificial Intelligence for Protein-Ligand Interactions Lack of Sufficiently Large and Unbiased Datasets

Yang, J., Shen, C., & Huang, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00069 · Cited by 124 · see citing works

Benchmark of four popular virtual screening programs: construction of the active/decoy dataset remains a major determinant of measured performance

Chaput, L., Martinez‐Sanz, J., Saettel, N., & Mouawad, L. (2016) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0167-x · Cited by 118 · see citing works

Decoys Selection in Benchmarking Datasets: Overview and Perspectives

Réau, M. F., Langenfeld, F., Zagury, J., Lagarde, N., & Montès, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00011 · Cited by 108 · see citing works

Generating property-matched decoy molecules using deep learning

Imrie, F., Bradley, A. R., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab080 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

A practical guide to machine-learning scoring for structure-based virtual screening

Tran‐Nguyen, V., Junaid, M., Simeon, S., & Ballester, P. J. (2023) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-023-00885-w · Cited by 97 · see citing works

Computational chemistry in drug lead discovery and design

Cavasotto, C. N., Aucar, M. G., & Adler, N. S. (2018) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.25678 · Cited by 83 · see citing works

Constructing and Validating High-Performance MIEC-SVM Models in Virtual Screening for Kinases: A Better Way for Actives Discovery

Sun, H., Pan, P., Tian, S., Xu, L., Kong, X., Li, Y., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24817 · Cited by 79 · see citing works

Statistical and machine learning approaches to predicting protein–ligand interactions

Colwell, L. J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2018.01.006 · Cited by 65 · see citing works

Ligand Strain Energy in Large Library Docking

Gu, S., Smith, M. S., Ying, Y., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00368 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

RASPD+: Fast Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Prediction Using Simplified Physicochemical Features

Holderbach, S., Adam, L., Jayaram, B., Wade, R. C., & Mukherjee, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.601065 · Cited by 43 · see citing works

GPCR-Bench: A Benchmarking Set and Practitioners’ Guide for G Protein-Coupled Receptor Docking

Weiss, D. R., Bortolato, A., Tehan, B. G., & Mason, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00660 · Cited by 36 · see citing works

Systemic QSAR and phenotypic virtual screening: chasing butterflies in drug discovery

Cruz‐Monteagudo, M., Schürer, S. C., Tejera, E., Pérez‐Castillo, Y., Medina‐Franco, J. L., Sánchez‐Rodríguez, A., & Borges, F. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.02.004 · Cited by 33 · see citing works

Accelerating Lead Identification by High Throughput Virtual Screening: Prospective Case Studies from the Pharmaceutical Industry

Damm‐Ganamet, K. L., Arora, N. R., Bécart, S., Edwards, J. P., Lebsack, A. D., McAllister, H., Nelen, M. I., Rao, N. L., Westover, L., Wiener, J. J. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00941 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Developing a Naïve Bayesian Classification Model with PI3Kγ structural features for virtual screening against PI3Kγ: Combining molecular docking and pharmacophore based on multiple PI3Kγ conformations

Jiang, Y., Xiong, W., Jia, L., Xu, L., Cai, Y., Chen, Y., Jin, J., Gao, M., & Zhu, J. (2022) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114824 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening

Arcon, J. P., Defelipe, L. A., Lopez, E. D., Burastero, O., Modenutti, C. P., Barril, X., Marti, M. A., & Turjanski, A. G. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00371 · Cited by 29 · see citing works

pROC-Chemotype Plots Enhance the Interpretability of Benchmarking Results in Structure-Based Virtual Screening

Ibrahim, T. M., Bauer, M. R., Dörr, A., Veyisoglu, E., & Boeckler, F. M. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00475 · Cited by 28 · see citing works

Cosolvent-Based Molecular Dynamics for Ensemble Docking: Practical Method for Generating Druggable Protein Conformations

Uehara, S., & Tanaka, S. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00791 · Cited by 28 · see citing works

AutoPH4: An Automated Method for Generating Pharmacophore Models from Protein Binding Pockets

Jiang, S., Fehér, M., Williams, C., Cole, B., & Shaw, D. E. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00121 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Predicting protein–ligand affinity with a random matrix framework

Lee, A. A., Brenner, M. P., & Colwell, L. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611138113 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Active fragments-guided drug discovery and design of selective tropane alkaloids using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry coupled with virtual calculation and biological evaluation

Zhou, M., Ma, X., Sun, J., Ding, G., Cui, Q., Yan, M., Hou, Y., Jiang, M., & Bai, G. (2016) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-016-0043-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works

Maximizing gain in high-throughput screening using conformal prediction

Svensson, F., Afzal, A. M., Norinder, U., & Bender, A. (2018) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0260-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

Discovery of furan carboxylate derivatives as novel inhibitors of ATP-citrate lyase via virtual high-throughput screening

Jernigan, F. E., Hanai, J., Sukhatme, V. P., & Sun, L. (2017) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.01.001 · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Virtual screening and drug repurposing experiments to identify potential novel selective MAO-B inhibitors for Parkinson’s disease treatment

Crisan, L., Istrate, D., Bora, A., & Pacureanu, L. M. (2020) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-020-10155-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Binding mode information improves fragment docking

Jacquemard, C., Drwal, M. N., Desaphy, J., & Kellenberger, E. (2019) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-019-0346-7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works

Rescoring and Linearly Combining: A Highly Effective Consensus Strategy for Virtual Screening Campaigns

Pedretti, A., Mazzolari, A., Gervasoni, S. I., & Vistoli, G. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20092060 · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Anticoagulant activity screening of an in-house database of natural compounds for discovering novel selective factor Xa inhibitors; a combined in silico and in vitro approach

Ibrahim, R. S., Mahrous, R. S., Fathy, H. M., Omar, A. A., & El-Khair, R. M. A. (2020) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-020-02516-5 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

OptiPharm: An evolutionary algorithm to compare shape similarity

Martín, S. P., Redondo, J. L., Ortigosa, P. M., & Pérez‐Sánchez, H. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37908-6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works

Benchmarking Data Sets from PubChem BioAssay Data: Current Scenario and Room for Improvement

Tran‐Nguyen, V., & Rognan, D. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21124380 · Cited by 18 · see citing works

Modulators of the Human ABCC2: Hope from Natural Sources?

Comsa, E., Crișan, G., Loghin, F., & Falson, P. (2015) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.15.131 · Cited by 17 · see citing works

Validation of structural-based virtual screening protocols with the PDB Code 3G0B and prediction of the activity of Tinospora crispa compounds as inhibitors of dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV

Prasetiyo, A., Kumala, S., Mumpuni, E., & Tjandrawinata, R. R. (2022) · Research Results in Pharmacology · doi:10.3897/rrpharmacology.8.76237 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

Structure‐based virtual screening aids the identification of glycosyltransferases in the biosynthesis of salidroside

Yao, Y., Chen, F., Wu, C., Chang, X., Cheng, W., Wang, Q., Deng, Z., Liu, T., & Lü, L. (2025) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.70002 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

Crystal structure of type II NADH:quinone oxidoreductase from Caldalkalibacillus thermarum with an improved resolution of 2.15 Å

Nakatani, Y., Jiao, W., Aragão, D., Shimaki, Y., Petri, J., Parker, E. J., & Cook, G. M. (2017) · Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications · doi:10.1107/s2053230x17013073 · Cited by 16 · see citing works

Efficient Hit-to-Lead Searching of Kinase Inhibitor Chemical Space via Computational Fragment Merging

Andrianov, G. V., Ong, W. J. G., Serebriiskii, I. G., & Karanicolas, J. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00630 · Cited by 15 · see citing works

Enhancing large-scale docking simulation on heterogeneous systems: An MPI vs rCUDA study

Imbernón, B., Prades, J., Domingo Giménez, C., Cecilia, J. M., & Silla, F. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.08.050 · Cited by 14 · see citing works

Critical Assessment of State‐of‐the‐Art Ligand‐Based Virtual Screening Methods

Sciabola, S., Torella, R., Nagata, A., & Boehm, M. (2022) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.202200103 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

Do Molecular Fingerprints Identify Diverse Active Drugs in Large-Scale Virtual Screening? (No)

Venkatraman, V., Gaiser, J., Demekas, D., Roy, A., Xiong, R., & Wheeler, T. J. (2024) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph17080992 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

In Silico Structure-Based Prediction of Receptor–Ligand Binding Affinity: Current Progress and Challenges

Panday, S. K., & Ghosh, I. (2019) · Challenges and advances in computational chemistry and physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05282-9_5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

MUBD‐DecoyMaker 2.0: A Python GUI Application to Generate Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Virtual Drug Screening

Xia, J., Li, S., Ding, Y., Wu, S., & Wang, X. S. (2019) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201900151 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

Computational Modeling of Multi-target-Directed Inhibitors Against Alzheimer’s Disease

Kumar, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2017) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7404-7_19 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

EvaluationMaster: A GUI Tool for Structure-Based Virtual Screening Evaluation Analysis and Decision-Making Support

Shen, Z., Chen, R., Gao, J. F., Chi, X., Zhang, Q., Bian, Q., Zhou, B., Che, J., Dai, H., & Dong, X. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01818 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

A Facile Consensus Ranking Approach Enhances Virtual Screening Robustness and Identifies a Cell-Active DYRK1α Inhibitor

Mavrogeni, M. E., Pronios, F., Zareifi, D., Vasilakaki, S., Lozach, O., Alexopoulos, L. G., Meijer, L., Myrianthopoulos, V., & Mikros, E. (2018) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2018-0198 · Cited by 9 · see citing works

Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Beta-Glucogallin and Dihydro Dehydro Coniferyl Alcohol from Syzygium cumini for its Antimicrobial Activity on Staphylococcus aureus

Bhavyashree, N., Vaishnavi, M. S., Shravani, P., & Sabat, S. (2024) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s12013-024-01489-1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works

Exploring isofunctional molecules: Design of a benchmark and evaluation of prediction performance

Pinel, P., Guichaoua, G., Najm, M., Labouille, S., Drizard, N., Gaston‐Mathé, Y., Hoffmann, B., & Stoven, V. (2023) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.202200216 · Cited by 7 · see citing works

Developing Generalizable Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking: Challenges and Perspectives

Quiroga, R., & Villarreal, M. A. (2024) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0109298673334469241017053508 · Cited by 7 · see citing works

In Silico Screening of Compound Libraries Using a Consensus of Orthogonal Methodologies

Myrianthopoulos, V., Lambrinidis, G., & Mikros, E. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8630-9_15 · Cited by 7 · see citing works

Identification of Natural Compounds with Analgesic and Antiinflammatory Properties Using Machine Learning and Molecular Docking Studies

Khan, M. F., Rashid, R. B., & Rashid, M. A. (2021) · Letters in Drug Design & Discovery · doi:10.2174/1570180818666210728162055 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Fine tuning for success in structure-based virtual screening

Pihan, É., Kotev, M. I., Rabal, O., Beato, C., & Gonzalez, C. D. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-021-00431-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Computational Modeling of Drugs for Alzheimer’s Disease: Design of Serotonin 5-HT6 Antagonists

Kelemen, Á. A., Mordalski, S., Bojarski, A. J., & Keserű, G. M. (2017) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7404-7_15 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

The use of dynamic computational models of neural circuitry to streamline new drug development

Arle, J. E., & Carlson, K. W. (2016) · Drug Discovery Today Disease Models · doi:10.1016/j.ddmod.2017.01.002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Chemoinformatics in Natural Product Research

Kaserer, T., Schuster, D., & Rollinger, J. M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527806539.ch6c · Cited by 4 · see citing works

Active Stacking-Deep Learning with Strategic Sampling for Small and Imbalanced Chemical Toxicity Prediction

Zetta, D. N., Shoombuatong, W., & Srisongkram, T. (2025) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c04016 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Deep reinforcement learning enables better bias control in benchmark for virtual screening

Shen, T., Li, S., Wang, X. S., Wang, D., Wu, S., Xia, J., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108165 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Increasing Molecular Dynamics Simulations Throughput by Virtualizing Remote GPUs with rCUDA

Prades, J., Reaño, C., Silla, F., Imbernón, B., Pérez‐Sánchez, H., & Cecilia, J. M. (2018) · International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops (ICPPW) · doi:10.1145/3229710.3229734 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Repurposing DrugBank compounds as potential Plasmodium falciparum class 1a aminoacyl tRNA synthetase multi-stage pan-inhibitors with a specific focus on mitomycin

Olotu, F. A., Tali, M. B. T., Chepsiror, C., Amamuddy, O. S., Boyom, F. F., & Bishop, Ö. T. (2024) · International Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.ijpddr.2024.100548 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Virtual Libraries for Docking Methods: Guidelines for the Selection and the Preparation

Sellami, A., Réau, M. F., Langenfeld, F., Lagarde, N., & Montès, M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822312-3.00017-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Identification of Natural Compounds with Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity using Machine Learning, Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies

Arifuzzaman, Mohammadi, M., Rupa, F. H., Khan, M. F., Rashid, R. B., & Rashid, M. A. (2022) · Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.3329/dujps.v21i1.60391 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies for the Antibacterial Activity of Bioactive Compound from Syzygium cumini against AMR Staphylococcus aureus

Pillanjinayya, S., Nagaraja, B., S, V. M., & Sabat, S. (2024) · Current Bioactive Compounds · doi:10.2174/0115734072309616240613071448 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

DUBS: A Framework for Developing D irectory of U seful B enchmarking S ets for Virtual Screening

Fine, J. A., Muhoberac, M., Fraux, G., & Chopra, G. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00122 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Molecular docking and pharmacophore modelling; A bridged explanation with emphasis on validation

Mahrous, R. S., Fathy, H. M., El-Khair, R. M. A., Omar, A. A., & Ibrahim, R. S. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.21608/japs.2024.253925.1007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Computational discovery of natural medicines targeting adenosine receptors for metabolic diseases

Wang, P., Xu, Z., Deng, Y., Yuan, H., Wu, Y.-K., Jiang, J., Lyu, Z., & Li, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1671415 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Representative Random Sampling of Chemical Space

Monterrubio-Chanca, D. J., & von Rudorff, G. F. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01523 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Virtual Screening: Practical Application of Docking, Consensus Scoring and Rescoring Using Binding Free Energy

Gupta, S., Waseem, M., Meena, N. K., Kuntal, R., Lynn, A. M., & Mishra, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8936-2_2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Maximizing resource usage in multifold molecular dynamics with rCUDA

Prades, J., Imbernón, B., Reaño, C., Peña-García, J. J., Cerón‐Carrasco, J. P., Silla, F., & Pérez‐Sánchez, H. (2019) · The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications · doi:10.1177/1094342019857131 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Community Benchmarking Exercises for Docking and Scoring

Devi, B., Baidya, A. T. K., & Kumar, R. (2024) · doi:10.1002/9783527840748.ch20 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Computational studies of biomolecular screening and interactions

Niinivehmas, S. P. (2015) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)

Using 3D Structural Information in Computational Design

Davis, A. M., & Edge, C. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.12339-x

Computational Modelling in Drug Discovery : Application of Structure-Based Drug Design, Conformal Prediction and Evaluation of Virtual Screening

Lindh, M. (2017) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

Application of Molecular Modelling to Speed-up the Lead Discovery Process

Trist, I. M. L., Botta, M., & Fallacara, A. L. (2017) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788010139-00281

Contribución a la identificación de potenciales antagonistas asociados al quorum sensing en Pseudomonas aeruginosa a través de métodos quimioinformáticos

Muñoz, V., & Felipe, D. (2021)

Discovery of HTL26119

Bortolato, A., & Mason, J. S. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119627784.ch9

In Silico Approaches for Drug Discovery Focus on Virtual Screenings

Distinto, S., & Maccioni, E. (2022) · International Scientific Conference Sinteza · doi:10.15308/sinteza-2022-360-364

Développement d’outils statistiques d’évaluation de méthodes de criblage virtuel : courbes de prédictivité & Screening Explorer

Empereur-mot, C. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2b288725z2446z48c5z833ezf53915cd324b

Conception d'un logiciel pour la recherche de nouvelles molécules bioactives

Bournez, C. (2019) · doi:10.70675/1a4f06f0zdfa4z41efza87az70239c45c50c

Development of new virtual screening methods and novel unbiased benchmarking data sets

Tran‐Nguyen, V. (2020) · doi:10.70675/c9cacc57zdf38z489bzacf8z0d5ecf73c80c

Docking and Machine Learning approaches to explore new scaffolds for molecules of therapeutic interest

Pinel, P. (2024) · doi:10.70675/6d2d07d5zc7aaz4c4bz9512z80b0c8fafa29

Identification of new therapeutic targets for cystic fibrosis using systems biology and chemogenomics approaches

Najm, M. (2023) · doi:10.70675/6c487b82zef74z4584z8ffaz2a1793756009

Beyond Docking: Intelligent Modeling and the New Landscape of Drug-Protein Interactions

Taha, M. M., Tayel, A., & Shoeib, H. O. T. A. T. (2025) · Biomedical engineering · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1013595

BindingDB Entry 50018792: Developing a Naïve Bayesian Classification Model with PI3Kγ structural features for virtual screening against PI3Kγ: Combining molecular docking and pharmacophore based on multiple PI3Kγ conformations.

BindingDB (2024) · UC San Diego · doi:10.7270/q2xd15xp

BindingDB Entry 50049099: Discovery of furan carboxylate derivatives as novel inhibitors of ATP-citrate lyase via virtual high-throughput screening.

BindingDB (2019) · UC San Diego · doi:10.7270/q2mp55hs

Toward a Benchmarking Data Set Able to Evaluate Ligand- and Structure-based Virtual Screening Using Public HTS Data

Lindh, M., Svensson, F., Schaal, W., Zhang, J., Sköld, C., Brandt, P., & Karlén, A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci5005465 · Cited by 24 · see citing works

How to Benchmark Methods for Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Large Compound Libraries

Christofferson, A. J., & Huang, N. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_13 · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Decoys Selection in Benchmarking Datasets: Overview and Perspectives

Réau, M. F., Langenfeld, F., Zagury, J., Lagarde, N., & Montès, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00011 · Cited by 108 · see citing works

Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening

Xia, J., Tilahun, E. L., Reid, T.-E. R., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. S. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.015 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Benchmarking platform for ligand-based virtual screening

Škoda, P., & Hoksza, D. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2016.7822693 · Cited by 7 · see citing works