Cited by 51Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Relevance Vector Machines: Sparse Classification Methods for QSAR

Burden, Frank R., Winkler, David A.·2015·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

Sparse machine learning methods have provided substantial benefits to quantitative structure property modeling, as they make model interpretation simpler and generate models with improved predictivity. Sparsity is usually induced via Bayesian regularization using sparsity-inducing priors and by the use of expectation maximization algorithms with sparse priors. The focus to date has been on using sparse methods to model continuous data and to carry out sparse feature selection. We describe the relevance vector machine (RVM), a sparse version of the support vector machine (SVM) that is one of the most widely used classification machine learning methods in QSAR and QSPR. We illustrate the superior properties of the RVM by modeling eight data sets using SVM, RVM, and another sparse Bayesian machine learning method, the Bayesian regularized artificial neural network with Laplacian prior (BRANNLP). We show that RVM models are substantially sparser than the SVM models and have similar or superior performance to them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00261

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burden, F. R., & Winkler, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Winkler, David A.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
1529-1534
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2405383071
Cited by
51
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
relevance vector machine, sparse classification, support vector machine, sparse Bayesian learning, sparsity-inducing priors, Bayesian regularization, QSPR, QSAR, model interpretability, feature selection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review