Cited by 14Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Accurate Predictions of Molecular Properties of Proteins via Graph Neural Networks and Transfer Learning

Open access
Wozniak, Spencer, Janson, Giacomo, Feig, Michael·2025·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT Machine learning has emerged as a promising approach for predicting molecular properties of proteins, as it addresses limitations of experimental and traditional computational methods. Here, we introduce GSnet, a graph neural network (GNN) trained to predict physicochemical and geometric properties including solvation free energies, diffusion constants, and hydrodynamic radii, based on three-dimensional protein structures. By leveraging transfer learning, pre-trained GSnet embeddings were adapted to predict solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) and residue-specific p K a values, achieving high accuracy and generalizability. Notably, GSnet outperformed existing protein embeddings for SASA prediction, and a locally charge-aware variant, aLCnet, approached the accuracy of simulation-based and empirical methods for p K a prediction. Our GNN framework demonstrated robustness across diverse datasets, including intrinsically disordered peptides, and scalability for high-throughput applications. These results highlight the potential of GNN-based embeddings and transfer learning to advance protein structure analysis, providing a foundation for integrating predictive models into proteome-wide studies and structural biology pipelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01682

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wozniak, S., Janson, G., & Feig, M.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Feig, Michael
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-04-24
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
4830-4845
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4409774501
Cited by
14
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 3
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB 2210228)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM126948)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein property prediction, graph neural networks, transfer learning, protein embeddings, solvation free energy, diffusion coefficient, hydrodynamic radius, solvent accessible surface area, pKa prediction, intrinsically disordered peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review