The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation and Validation of Fully Relativistic GW Calculations: Spin–Orbit Coupling in Molecules, Nanocrystals, and Solids
Open accessAbstract
We present an implementation of G0W0 calculations including spin-orbit coupling (SOC) enabling investigations of large systems, with thousands of electrons, and we discuss results for molecules, solids, and nanocrystals. Using a newly developed set of molecules with heavy elements (called GW-SOC81), we find that, when based upon hybrid density functional calculations, fully relativistic (FR) and scalar-relativistic (SR) G0W0 calculations of vertical ionization potentials both yield excellent performance compared to experiment, with errors below 1.9%. We demonstrate that while SR calculations have higher random errors, FR calculations systematically underestimate the VIP by 0.1 to 0.2 eV. We further verify that SOC effects may be well approximated at the FR density functional level and then added to SR G0W0 results for a broad class of systems. We also address the use of different root-finding algorithms for the G0W0 quasiparticle equation and the significant influence of including d electrons in the valence partition of the pseudopotential for G0W0 calculations. Finally, we present statistical analyses of our data, highlighting the importance of separating definitive improvements from those that may occur by chance due to a limited number of samples. We suggest the statistical analyses used here will be useful in the assessment of the accuracy of a large variety of electronic structure methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Kim, H.-S., Lee, C.-R., Im, J.-H., Lee, K.-B., Moehl, T., Marchioro, A., Moon, S.-J., Humphry-Baker, R., Yum, J.-H., Moser, J. E., et al. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00591 · Cited by 8,092
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials
Hamann, D. R. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.085117 · Cited by 3,379
Spin—Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems
Winkler, R. (2003) · Springer Tracts in Modern Physics · doi:10.1007/b13586 · Cited by 2,489
Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu
Dal Corso, A. (2014) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.043 · Cited by 2,016
Improved performance and stability in quantum dot solar cells through band alignment engineering
Chuang, C.-H. M., Brown, P. R., Bulović, V., & Bawendi, M. G. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3984 · Cited by 1,795
Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials
Schlipf, M., & Gygi, F. (2015) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.05.011 · Cited by 1,300
Cited by
The GW approximation: content, successes and limitations
Reining, L. (2018) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1344 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Scherpelz, P., Govoni, M., Hamada, I., & Galli, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-07-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3523-3544
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2473581447
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation and Validation of Fully Relativistic GW Calculations: Spin–Orbit Coupling in Molecules, Nanocrystals, and Solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00114
- The paper
- Scherpelz, P., Govoni, M., Hamada, I., & Galli, G. (2016). Implementation and Validation of Fully Relativistic GW Calculations: Spin–Orbit Coupling in Molecules, Nanocrystals, and Solids. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.