Cited by 22Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Can Generative-Model-Based Drug Design Become a New Normal in Drug Discovery?

Chen, Hongming·2022·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

It is still rare that AI application examples with full DMTA (Design, Make, Test, Analysis) outcomes are reported. A recent study highlights that a generative model could be applied in the drug discovery process through an example in which ideas generated by an AI generative model were confirmed by following wet-lab works.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02042

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Hongming
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2021-12-16
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
100-102
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W4200240318
Cited by
21
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
generative models, artificial intelligence in drug discovery, generative drug design, wet-lab validation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Drug Design, Neural Networks, Computer, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review