Cited by 832Computational Drug Discovery MethodsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles

Open access
Besnard, Jérémy, Ruda, Gian Filippo, Setola, Vincent, Abecassis, Keren, Rodriguiz, Ramona M., Huang, Xi-Ping, Norval, Suzanne, Sassano, Maria F. +13 more·2012·Nature

Abstract

The clinical efficacy and safety of a drug is determined by its activity profile across many proteins in the proteome. However, designing drugs with a specific multi-target profile is both complex and difficult. Therefore methods to design drugs rationally a priori against profiles of several proteins would have immense value in drug discovery. Here we describe a new approach for the automated design of ligands against profiles of multiple drug targets. The method is demonstrated by the evolution of an approved acetylcholinesterase inhibitor drug into brain-penetrable ligands with either specific polypharmacology or exquisite selectivity profiles for G-protein-coupled receptors. Overall, 800 ligand-target predictions of prospectively designed ligands were tested experimentally, of which 75% were confirmed to be correct. We also demonstrate target engagement in vivo. The approach can be a useful source of drug leads when multi-target profiles are required to achieve either selectivity over other drug targets or a desired polypharmacology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11691

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [40]Fanelli F De Benedetti PG Vaz RJ Klabunde T Antitargets: Prediction and Prevention of Drug Side Effects 2008 Wiley-VCH
  2. [56]Corne DW Knowles JD 773 780 Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Besnard, J., Ruda, G. F., Setola, V., Abecassis, K., Rodriguiz, R. M., Huang, X.-P., Norval, S., Sassano, M. F., Shin, A. I., Webster, L. A., Simeons, F. R. C., Stojanovski, L., Prat, A., Seidah, N. G., Constam, D. B., Bickerton, G. R., Read, K. D., Wetsel, W. C., Gilbert, I. H., Roth, B. L., & Hopkins, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Montreal Clinical Research Institute (CA)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Roth, Bryan L.
  • Hopkins, Andrew L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-12
Volume
492
Issue
7428
Pages
215-220
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2034475831
Cited by
832
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 1
FWCI
58.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • University of Dundee
  • Wellcome Trust (WT 083481, 083481)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J010510/1, BB/FOF/PF/15/09)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U19MH082441, MH082441, R01MH061887)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017204)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
polypharmacology, multi-target drug design, G protein-coupled receptors, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, target engagement, drug selectivity, adaptive design
MeSH terms
Pharmacological Phenomena, Animals, Automation, Female, Ligands, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Models, Theoretical, Drug Design, Reproducibility of Results, Drug Delivery Systems, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review